Imprudence and Immorality: A Kantian Approach to the Ethics of Financial Risk

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

28 Scopus citations

Abstract

This paper takes up recent challenges to consequentialist forms of ethically evaluating risks and explores how a non-consequentialist form of deliberation, Kantian ethics, can address questions about risk. I examine two cases concerning ethically questionable financial risks: investing in abstruse financial instruments and investing while relying on a bailout. After challenging consequentialist evaluations of these cases, I use Kant's distinction between morality and prudence to evaluate when the investments are immoral and when they are merely imprudent. I argue that the investment practices are imprudent when they do not take adequate precautions to secure the firm's long-term flourishing. They are immoral in a Kantian sense when they risk the destruction of the financial system upon which the firms depend. The upshot of my analysis is that moral actions require more risk aversion than prudent actions and prudent actions require more risk aversion than expected-value-maximizing actions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)243-265
Number of pages23
JournalBusiness Ethics Quarterly
Volume25
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2015
Externally publishedYes

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Business, Management and Accounting(all)
  • Philosophy
  • Economics and Econometrics

Keywords

  • Ethics of Risk
  • Financial Risk
  • Formula of Universal Law
  • Investment Ethics
  • Kantian Ethics
  • Too Big To Fail

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Imprudence and Immorality: A Kantian Approach to the Ethics of Financial Risk'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this