Incentives to settle under joint and several liability: An empirical analysis of superfund litigation

Howard F. Chang, Hilary Sigman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

24 Scopus citations

Abstract

Congress may soon restrict joint and several liability for cleanup of contaminated sites under Superfund. We explore whether this change would discourage settle-ments and is therefore likely to increase the program's already high litigation costs per site. Recent theoretical research by Kornhauser and Revesz finds that joint and several liability may either encourage or discourage settlement, depending on the correlation of outcomes at trial across defendants. We extend their two-defendant model to a richer framework with N defendants. This extension allows us to test the theoretical model empirically using data on Superfund litigation. We find that joint and several liability does not discourage settlements and may even encourage them. Our results support the model's predictions about the effects of several variables, such as the degree of correlation in trial outcomes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)205
Number of pages1
JournalJournal of Legal Studies
Volume29
Issue number1 PART I
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2000

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Law

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Incentives to settle under joint and several liability: An empirical analysis of superfund litigation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this