Abstract
Congress may soon restrict joint and several liability for cleanup of contaminated sites under Superfund. We explore whether this change would discourage settle-ments and is therefore likely to increase the program's already high litigation costs per site. Recent theoretical research by Kornhauser and Revesz finds that joint and several liability may either encourage or discourage settlement, depending on the correlation of outcomes at trial across defendants. We extend their two-defendant model to a richer framework with N defendants. This extension allows us to test the theoretical model empirically using data on Superfund litigation. We find that joint and several liability does not discourage settlements and may even encourage them. Our results support the model's predictions about the effects of several variables, such as the degree of correlation in trial outcomes.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 205 |
Number of pages | 1 |
Journal | Journal of Legal Studies |
Volume | 29 |
Issue number | 1 PART I |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Jan 2000 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Law