Institutional ownership and monitoring: Evidence from financial misreporting

Natasha Burns, Simi Kedia, Marc Lipson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

135 Scopus citations

Abstract

We find that the likelihood and severity of financial misreporting is positively related to aggregate institutional ownership and this effect can be largely attributed to ownership by institutions with short investment horizons - those with little incentive to engage in costly monitoring of firm activities and precisely those that sell at the announcement of a restatement. We also find that the concentration of holdings by these institutions offsets this effect, which suggests concentrated ownership induces greater monitoring and mitigates the incentives for firms to misreport. Our results suggest that any link between myopic firm decision making and institutional ownership may be related to the nature of institutional monitoring.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)443-455
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Corporate Finance
Volume16
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2010

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Business and International Management
  • Finance
  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Strategy and Management

Keywords

  • Earnings management
  • Institutional investors
  • Monitoring
  • Restatements

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Institutional ownership and monitoring: Evidence from financial misreporting'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this