Interpretation of part boundaries and the movement of attention

Elan Barenholtz, Jacob Feldman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose and Methods: It is widely believed that the visual system tends to divide smooth contours into separate parts at points of minimum curvature (i.e., points of maximum concavity). We investigated the factors determining part-boundaries using a visual decision task, in which subjects were asked to judge whether two marks placed at distant points along the contour were the same or different. It is known that judgments in this task are slower when the two marks lie on different objects, possibly reflecting the increased time required to move attention from one object to the other. We tested whether a similar deficit applies when the two marks lie on the same object but on opposite sides of a putative part boundary. The crucial comparison was between contour segments with identical curvature but differing in the sign of curvature (i.e. convex vs. concave), as only concave curvature extrema are expected to be perceived as part boundaries. Results: We found a significant effect for concavity/convexity, i.e a deficit for cases where marks were within different parts as compared to within a part. This difference grew with the magnitude of the curvature at the part boundary, corroborating recent proposals that the salience of parts is determined partly by the magnitude of curvature at the concavity. Response latency also generally increased with the magnitude of curvature, independent of its sign. In subsequent experiments, we found that the between-parts deficit disappears when the global configuration is not consistent with a part-boundary interpretation. Conclusions: Part boundaries-as determined by concavity, curvature, and global configuration-create a measurable delay in the movement of attention along a contour.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of vision
Volume1
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2001

Fingerprint

Reaction Time

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Ophthalmology
  • Sensory Systems

Cite this

@article{f5c86d104ca34aebb4c2ef8044e225a4,
title = "Interpretation of part boundaries and the movement of attention",
abstract = "Purpose and Methods: It is widely believed that the visual system tends to divide smooth contours into separate parts at points of minimum curvature (i.e., points of maximum concavity). We investigated the factors determining part-boundaries using a visual decision task, in which subjects were asked to judge whether two marks placed at distant points along the contour were the same or different. It is known that judgments in this task are slower when the two marks lie on different objects, possibly reflecting the increased time required to move attention from one object to the other. We tested whether a similar deficit applies when the two marks lie on the same object but on opposite sides of a putative part boundary. The crucial comparison was between contour segments with identical curvature but differing in the sign of curvature (i.e. convex vs. concave), as only concave curvature extrema are expected to be perceived as part boundaries. Results: We found a significant effect for concavity/convexity, i.e a deficit for cases where marks were within different parts as compared to within a part. This difference grew with the magnitude of the curvature at the part boundary, corroborating recent proposals that the salience of parts is determined partly by the magnitude of curvature at the concavity. Response latency also generally increased with the magnitude of curvature, independent of its sign. In subsequent experiments, we found that the between-parts deficit disappears when the global configuration is not consistent with a part-boundary interpretation. Conclusions: Part boundaries-as determined by concavity, curvature, and global configuration-create a measurable delay in the movement of attention along a contour.",
author = "Elan Barenholtz and Jacob Feldman",
year = "2001",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1167/1.3.216",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "1",
journal = "Journal of Vision",
issn = "1534-7362",
publisher = "Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology Inc.",
number = "3",

}

Interpretation of part boundaries and the movement of attention. / Barenholtz, Elan; Feldman, Jacob.

In: Journal of vision, Vol. 1, No. 3, 01.12.2001.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Interpretation of part boundaries and the movement of attention

AU - Barenholtz, Elan

AU - Feldman, Jacob

PY - 2001/12/1

Y1 - 2001/12/1

N2 - Purpose and Methods: It is widely believed that the visual system tends to divide smooth contours into separate parts at points of minimum curvature (i.e., points of maximum concavity). We investigated the factors determining part-boundaries using a visual decision task, in which subjects were asked to judge whether two marks placed at distant points along the contour were the same or different. It is known that judgments in this task are slower when the two marks lie on different objects, possibly reflecting the increased time required to move attention from one object to the other. We tested whether a similar deficit applies when the two marks lie on the same object but on opposite sides of a putative part boundary. The crucial comparison was between contour segments with identical curvature but differing in the sign of curvature (i.e. convex vs. concave), as only concave curvature extrema are expected to be perceived as part boundaries. Results: We found a significant effect for concavity/convexity, i.e a deficit for cases where marks were within different parts as compared to within a part. This difference grew with the magnitude of the curvature at the part boundary, corroborating recent proposals that the salience of parts is determined partly by the magnitude of curvature at the concavity. Response latency also generally increased with the magnitude of curvature, independent of its sign. In subsequent experiments, we found that the between-parts deficit disappears when the global configuration is not consistent with a part-boundary interpretation. Conclusions: Part boundaries-as determined by concavity, curvature, and global configuration-create a measurable delay in the movement of attention along a contour.

AB - Purpose and Methods: It is widely believed that the visual system tends to divide smooth contours into separate parts at points of minimum curvature (i.e., points of maximum concavity). We investigated the factors determining part-boundaries using a visual decision task, in which subjects were asked to judge whether two marks placed at distant points along the contour were the same or different. It is known that judgments in this task are slower when the two marks lie on different objects, possibly reflecting the increased time required to move attention from one object to the other. We tested whether a similar deficit applies when the two marks lie on the same object but on opposite sides of a putative part boundary. The crucial comparison was between contour segments with identical curvature but differing in the sign of curvature (i.e. convex vs. concave), as only concave curvature extrema are expected to be perceived as part boundaries. Results: We found a significant effect for concavity/convexity, i.e a deficit for cases where marks were within different parts as compared to within a part. This difference grew with the magnitude of the curvature at the part boundary, corroborating recent proposals that the salience of parts is determined partly by the magnitude of curvature at the concavity. Response latency also generally increased with the magnitude of curvature, independent of its sign. In subsequent experiments, we found that the between-parts deficit disappears when the global configuration is not consistent with a part-boundary interpretation. Conclusions: Part boundaries-as determined by concavity, curvature, and global configuration-create a measurable delay in the movement of attention along a contour.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=4143142169&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=4143142169&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1167/1.3.216

DO - 10.1167/1.3.216

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:4143142169

VL - 1

JO - Journal of Vision

JF - Journal of Vision

SN - 1534-7362

IS - 3

ER -