Large variability in ecosystem models explains uncertainty in a critical parameter for quantifying GPP with carbonyl sulphide

Timothy W. Hilton, Andrew Zumkehr, Sarika Kulkarni, Joe Berry, Mary E. Whelan, J. Elliott Campbell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

15 Scopus citations

Abstract

Regional gross primary productivity (GPP) estimates are crucial to estimating carbon-climate feedbacks but are highly uncertain with existing methods. An emerging approach uses atmospheric carbonyl sulphide (COS) as a tracer for carbon dioxide: COS plant uptake is simulated by scaling GPP. Acritical parameter for this method is leaf-scale relative uptake (LRU). Plant chamber and eddy covariance studies find a narrow range of LRU values but some atmospheric modelling studies assign values well outside this range. Here we study this discrepancy by conducting new regional chemical transport simulations for North America using the underlying data from previous studies. We find the wide range of ecosystem model GPP estimates can explain the discrepancy in LRU values. We also find that COS concentration uncertainty is more sensitive to GPP uncertainty than to LRU parameter uncertainty. These results support the COS tracer technique as a useful approach for constraining GPP estimates.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number26329
JournalTellus, Series B: Chemical and Physical Meteorology
Volume67
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2015
Externally publishedYes

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Atmospheric Science

Keywords

  • Carbon cycle
  • Carbonyl sulphide
  • GPP

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Large variability in ecosystem models explains uncertainty in a critical parameter for quantifying GPP with carbonyl sulphide'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this