Legal dimensions of neural antecedents to voluntary action

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debatepeer-review

1 Scopus citations


Abstract: This article considers the arguments of Nachev and Hacker in the context of claims that Libet’s experiments regarding the readiness potential pose challenges for the criminal law, specifically for the distinction between voluntary and involuntary acts.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)216-217
Number of pages2
JournalCognitive Neuroscience
StatePublished - Oct 2 2014
Externally publishedYes

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Cognitive Neuroscience

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Legal dimensions of neural antecedents to voluntary action'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this