Lexical categories: Legacy, lacuna, and opportunity for functionalists and formalists

Mark Baker, William Croft

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

The fundamental importance of lexical categories is uncontroversial within both formal and functional approaches to grammatical analysis. But despite the familiarity of this topic and its foundational nature for grammatical description and analysis, it is paradoxically not among the best-studied or-understood topics from either the functionalist or formalist perspective. Both schools of linguistic theory have inherited their basic assumptions and instincts about lexical categories from the structuralist practice of distributional analysis. We briefly survey approaches to the various lexical categories. We then comment on a few issues of strategic value that arise from these approaches, including the importance of clearly distinguishing roots, stems, words, and syntactic units when it comes to issues of lexical categories; the importance of recognizing when distributional tests are similar across languages in principled ways; and the need for the choice of distributional tests to be informed by theoretical hypotheses.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)179-197
Number of pages19
JournalAnnual Review of Linguistics
Volume3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 14 2017

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language

Keywords

  • Lexical categories
  • comparative concepts
  • distributional analysis
  • formal linguistics
  • functional linguistics
  • parts of speech

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Lexical categories: Legacy, lacuna, and opportunity for functionalists and formalists'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this