TY - JOUR
T1 - Locally optimum adaptive signal processing algorithms
AU - Moustakides, George V.
N1 - Funding Information:
Manuscript received April 2, 1997; revised March 19, 1998. This work was supported by the Greek General Secretariat for Research and Technology under Grant ENE 96:1584. The associate editor coordinating the review of this paper and approving it for publication was Prof. Chi Chung Ko. The author is with the Department of Computer Engineering and Informatics, University of Patras, Patras, Greece. Publisher Item Identifier S 1053-587X(98)08698-X.
PY - 1998
Y1 - 1998
N2 - We propose a new analytic method for comparing constant gain adaptive signal processing algorithms. Specifically, estimates of the convergence speed of the algorithms allow for the definition of a local measure of performance, called the efficacy, that can be theoretically evaluated. By definition, the efficacy is consistent with the fair comparison techniques currently used in signal processing applications. Using the efficacy as a performance measure, we prove that the LMS-Newton algorithm is optimum and is, thus, the fastest algorithm within a very rich algorithmic class. Furthermore, we prove that the regular LMS is better than any of its variants that apply the same nonlinear transformation on the elements of the regression vector (such as signed regressor, quantized regressor, etc.) for an important class of input signals. Simulations support all our theoretical conclusions.
AB - We propose a new analytic method for comparing constant gain adaptive signal processing algorithms. Specifically, estimates of the convergence speed of the algorithms allow for the definition of a local measure of performance, called the efficacy, that can be theoretically evaluated. By definition, the efficacy is consistent with the fair comparison techniques currently used in signal processing applications. Using the efficacy as a performance measure, we prove that the LMS-Newton algorithm is optimum and is, thus, the fastest algorithm within a very rich algorithmic class. Furthermore, we prove that the regular LMS is better than any of its variants that apply the same nonlinear transformation on the elements of the regression vector (such as signed regressor, quantized regressor, etc.) for an important class of input signals. Simulations support all our theoretical conclusions.
KW - Adaptive estimation
KW - Adaptive filters
KW - Adaptive signal processing
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032303328&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032303328&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/78.735306
DO - 10.1109/78.735306
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0032303328
VL - 46
SP - 3315
EP - 3325
JO - IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing
JF - IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing
SN - 1053-587X
IS - 12
ER -