TY - JOUR
T1 - Mandating treatment for drug possessors
T2 - The impact of Senate Bill 123 on the criminal justice system in Kansas
AU - Stemen, Don
AU - Rengifo, Andres F.
N1 - Funding Information:
This project was supported by a grant from the National Institute of Justice (grant # 2006-IJ-CX-0032). The authors would like to thank the staff at the Kansas Sentencing Commission for their tireless assistance and cooperation throughout the study.
PY - 2009/5
Y1 - 2009/5
N2 - Kansas' Senate Bill 123 (SB 123) created mandatory community-based drug treatment for individuals convicted of first- or second-offense drug possession. This study examined the impact of SB 123 on sentencing practices, supervision, and treatment services across Kansas. The study indicated that SB 123 diverted drug possessors not from prison, as intended, but from one form of community supervision to another, subjecting more offenders to greater surveillance and longer sentences. Such "front-end" net-widening was due to the structure of the law itself and a lack of understanding of pre-implementation sentencing practices. In some counties, judges engaged in some circumvention of the law, suggesting possible local-level differences in buy-in among courtroom actors; such circumvention was also focused on offenders with more serious criminal histories, indicating judicial-level evaluations of offender amenability to treatment. While SB 123 offenders received the treatment they were assessed to need, the provision of treatment remained heavily concentrated in a few providers, increasing disparities in access to treatment and making the success of the program highly dependant on a small number of institutional actors.
AB - Kansas' Senate Bill 123 (SB 123) created mandatory community-based drug treatment for individuals convicted of first- or second-offense drug possession. This study examined the impact of SB 123 on sentencing practices, supervision, and treatment services across Kansas. The study indicated that SB 123 diverted drug possessors not from prison, as intended, but from one form of community supervision to another, subjecting more offenders to greater surveillance and longer sentences. Such "front-end" net-widening was due to the structure of the law itself and a lack of understanding of pre-implementation sentencing practices. In some counties, judges engaged in some circumvention of the law, suggesting possible local-level differences in buy-in among courtroom actors; such circumvention was also focused on offenders with more serious criminal histories, indicating judicial-level evaluations of offender amenability to treatment. While SB 123 offenders received the treatment they were assessed to need, the provision of treatment remained heavily concentrated in a few providers, increasing disparities in access to treatment and making the success of the program highly dependant on a small number of institutional actors.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=67349154771&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=67349154771&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2009.04.010
DO - 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2009.04.010
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:67349154771
SN - 0047-2352
VL - 37
SP - 296
EP - 304
JO - Journal of Criminal Justice
JF - Journal of Criminal Justice
IS - 3
ER -