TY - JOUR
T1 - Mental health specialized probation caseloads
T2 - Are they effective?
AU - Wolff, Nancy
AU - Epperson, Matthew
AU - Shi, Jing
AU - Huening, Jessica
AU - Schumann, Brooke E.
AU - Sullivan, Irene Rubinson
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was supported by a grant from the National Institute of Justice (Grant # 2010-SC-BX-0002 ).
PY - 2014/9
Y1 - 2014/9
N2 - With the large and growing number of persons with mental illnesses under probation supervision, a form of specialized probation called specialized mental health caseload (SMHC) has been implemented. This study explores the effectiveness of a prototypic SMHC implemented statewide. A quasi-experimental design was used to compare criminal justice, mental health, and community engagement outcomes among three caseloads: a newly established SMHC supervising no more than 30 clients per officer (N. =. 1367); an established SMHC supervising roughly 50 clients per officer (N. =. 495); and a traditional caseload of clients receiving mental health treatment and supervised by officers with average caseloads of over 130 clients (N. =. 5453). Using a mixed methods approach, we found that the SMHC was implemented with high adherence to fidelity, and comparisons based on different caseload samples generally support the effectiveness of the specialized mental health caseload, particularly on criminal justice outcomes. Future studies using random assignment are needed to examine the connection among mental health symptoms, compliance with treatment and probation supervision, and recidivism.
AB - With the large and growing number of persons with mental illnesses under probation supervision, a form of specialized probation called specialized mental health caseload (SMHC) has been implemented. This study explores the effectiveness of a prototypic SMHC implemented statewide. A quasi-experimental design was used to compare criminal justice, mental health, and community engagement outcomes among three caseloads: a newly established SMHC supervising no more than 30 clients per officer (N. =. 1367); an established SMHC supervising roughly 50 clients per officer (N. =. 495); and a traditional caseload of clients receiving mental health treatment and supervised by officers with average caseloads of over 130 clients (N. =. 5453). Using a mixed methods approach, we found that the SMHC was implemented with high adherence to fidelity, and comparisons based on different caseload samples generally support the effectiveness of the specialized mental health caseload, particularly on criminal justice outcomes. Future studies using random assignment are needed to examine the connection among mental health symptoms, compliance with treatment and probation supervision, and recidivism.
KW - Effectiveness
KW - Mental illnesses
KW - Probation supervision
KW - Recidivism
KW - Specialized mental health caseloads
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84906268706&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84906268706&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijlp.2014.02.019
DO - 10.1016/j.ijlp.2014.02.019
M3 - Article
C2 - 24630740
AN - SCOPUS:84906268706
SN - 0160-2527
VL - 37
SP - 464
EP - 472
JO - International Journal of Law and Psychiatry
JF - International Journal of Law and Psychiatry
IS - 5
ER -