'Might' Made Right

Kai Von Fintel, Anthony Gillies

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

56 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The simplest story about modals is also the canon: modals are contextdependent quantifiers over a domain of possibilities. Epistemic modals quantify over possibilities compatible with what is known. Just whose knowledge, or whose information state, is relevant is something decided by the context. The canon is simple and elegant but not quite right. The problem with the canon is that it is weighed down by the fiction that there is a determinate context in which an utterance of a bare epistemic modal is issued. On the story of this chapter, it is indeterminate just which group, or just which aggregated information state, is quantified over by such bare epistemic modals. This chapter explores how a story that exploits this contextual indeterminacy can explain what needs explaining without departing from what's right about the canon and so without positing anything semantically peculiar about bare occurrences of epistemic modals.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationEpistemic Modality
PublisherOxford University Press
ISBN (Electronic)9780191729027
ISBN (Print)9780199591596
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 22 2011

Fingerprint

Canon
Epistemic Modals
Utterance
Indeterminate
Quantifiers
Contextual
Fiction
Indeterminacy

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Arts and Humanities(all)

Cite this

Fintel, K. V., & Gillies, A. (2011). 'Might' Made Right. In Epistemic Modality Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199591596.003.0004
Fintel, Kai Von ; Gillies, Anthony. / 'Might' Made Right. Epistemic Modality. Oxford University Press, 2011.
@inbook{7cb1dbdba1734a7db344dfccccb1d3a6,
title = "'Might' Made Right",
abstract = "The simplest story about modals is also the canon: modals are contextdependent quantifiers over a domain of possibilities. Epistemic modals quantify over possibilities compatible with what is known. Just whose knowledge, or whose information state, is relevant is something decided by the context. The canon is simple and elegant but not quite right. The problem with the canon is that it is weighed down by the fiction that there is a determinate context in which an utterance of a bare epistemic modal is issued. On the story of this chapter, it is indeterminate just which group, or just which aggregated information state, is quantified over by such bare epistemic modals. This chapter explores how a story that exploits this contextual indeterminacy can explain what needs explaining without departing from what's right about the canon and so without positing anything semantically peculiar about bare occurrences of epistemic modals.",
author = "Fintel, {Kai Von} and Anthony Gillies",
year = "2011",
month = "9",
day = "22",
doi = "10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199591596.003.0004",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780199591596",
booktitle = "Epistemic Modality",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
address = "United Kingdom",

}

Fintel, KV & Gillies, A 2011, 'Might' Made Right. in Epistemic Modality. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199591596.003.0004

'Might' Made Right. / Fintel, Kai Von; Gillies, Anthony.

Epistemic Modality. Oxford University Press, 2011.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - 'Might' Made Right

AU - Fintel, Kai Von

AU - Gillies, Anthony

PY - 2011/9/22

Y1 - 2011/9/22

N2 - The simplest story about modals is also the canon: modals are contextdependent quantifiers over a domain of possibilities. Epistemic modals quantify over possibilities compatible with what is known. Just whose knowledge, or whose information state, is relevant is something decided by the context. The canon is simple and elegant but not quite right. The problem with the canon is that it is weighed down by the fiction that there is a determinate context in which an utterance of a bare epistemic modal is issued. On the story of this chapter, it is indeterminate just which group, or just which aggregated information state, is quantified over by such bare epistemic modals. This chapter explores how a story that exploits this contextual indeterminacy can explain what needs explaining without departing from what's right about the canon and so without positing anything semantically peculiar about bare occurrences of epistemic modals.

AB - The simplest story about modals is also the canon: modals are contextdependent quantifiers over a domain of possibilities. Epistemic modals quantify over possibilities compatible with what is known. Just whose knowledge, or whose information state, is relevant is something decided by the context. The canon is simple and elegant but not quite right. The problem with the canon is that it is weighed down by the fiction that there is a determinate context in which an utterance of a bare epistemic modal is issued. On the story of this chapter, it is indeterminate just which group, or just which aggregated information state, is quantified over by such bare epistemic modals. This chapter explores how a story that exploits this contextual indeterminacy can explain what needs explaining without departing from what's right about the canon and so without positing anything semantically peculiar about bare occurrences of epistemic modals.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84921665845&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84921665845&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199591596.003.0004

DO - 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199591596.003.0004

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:84921665845

SN - 9780199591596

BT - Epistemic Modality

PB - Oxford University Press

ER -

Fintel KV, Gillies A. 'Might' Made Right. In Epistemic Modality. Oxford University Press. 2011 https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199591596.003.0004