Mitochondrial replacement therapy

Michael P. Dougherty, Shelley Dolitsky, Rhea Chattopadhyay, Mark V. Sauer

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose of review The present study briefly reviews the history of mitochondrial replacement therapy (MRT); however, the focus is on recent advancements and future directions of the field. Specifically addressing societal and legal concerns and advances in MRT. Recent findings There continue to be new ethical debates surrounding MRT. In addition, there have been advancements in MRT techniques which could improve potential outcomes. Furthermore, advances in genetics continue to provide alternative approaches to treatment of many diseases, including alternatives to MRT. Summary MRT may be beneficial to eradicate a severely debilitating and often fatal disease. Despite significant supporting safety and efficacy, there are still many social and legal barriers to instituting MRT to clinical practice.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)217-222
Number of pages6
JournalCurrent Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology
Volume30
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2018

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Keywords

  • embryo
  • karyosome
  • mitochondria
  • nuclear spindle
  • pronucleus
  • wild-type
  • zygote

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Mitochondrial replacement therapy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this