TY - JOUR
T1 - Mixed Methods Community-Engaged Evaluation
T2 - Integrating Interventionist and Action Research Frameworks to Understand a Community-Building Violence Prevention Program
AU - Banyard, Victoria L.
AU - Edwards, Katie M.
AU - Rizzo, Andrew J.
AU - Segura-Montagut, Anna
AU - Greenberg, Patricia
AU - Kearns, Megan C.
N1 - Funding Information:
The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work was supported by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Grant CE002652, Victoria Banyard (PI). The findings and implications presented in this paper are those of the authors and do not represent the official position of the CDC.
Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2022.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - While mixed methods research can enhance studies of intervention outcomes and projects where research itself transforms communities through participatory approaches, methodologists need explicit examples. As the field of interpersonal violence prevention increasingly embraces community-level prevention strategies, it may benefit from research methods that mirror community-building prevention processes. A multiphase mixed methods study with sequential and convergent components assessed the feasibility, and impact of a prevention program to change social norms and increase collective efficacy in towns. Joint display analysis created a nuanced picture of the acceptability, feasibility, and impact of the program. This article contributes to the field of mixed methods research by bridging discussions of “interventionist” studies with models of community-based participatory mixed methods research into a combined community-engaged method.
AB - While mixed methods research can enhance studies of intervention outcomes and projects where research itself transforms communities through participatory approaches, methodologists need explicit examples. As the field of interpersonal violence prevention increasingly embraces community-level prevention strategies, it may benefit from research methods that mirror community-building prevention processes. A multiphase mixed methods study with sequential and convergent components assessed the feasibility, and impact of a prevention program to change social norms and increase collective efficacy in towns. Joint display analysis created a nuanced picture of the acceptability, feasibility, and impact of the program. This article contributes to the field of mixed methods research by bridging discussions of “interventionist” studies with models of community-based participatory mixed methods research into a combined community-engaged method.
KW - interventionist research
KW - multi-phase mixed methods
KW - prevention
KW - sexual violence
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85132106403&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85132106403&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/15586898221108013
DO - 10.1177/15586898221108013
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85132106403
SN - 1558-6898
JO - Journal of Mixed Methods Research
JF - Journal of Mixed Methods Research
ER -