Mixed Methods Community-Engaged Evaluation: Integrating Interventionist and Action Research Frameworks to Understand a Community-Building Violence Prevention Program

Victoria L. Banyard, Katie M. Edwards, Andrew J. Rizzo, Anna Segura-Montagut, Patricia Greenberg, Megan C. Kearns

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

While mixed methods research can enhance studies of intervention outcomes and projects where research itself transforms communities through participatory approaches, methodologists need explicit examples. As the field of interpersonal violence prevention increasingly embraces community-level prevention strategies, it may benefit from research methods that mirror community-building prevention processes. A multiphase mixed methods study with sequential and convergent components assessed the feasibility, and impact of a prevention program to change social norms and increase collective efficacy in towns. Joint display analysis created a nuanced picture of the acceptability, feasibility, and impact of the program. This article contributes to the field of mixed methods research by bridging discussions of “interventionist” studies with models of community-based participatory mixed methods research into a combined community-engaged method.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Mixed Methods Research
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2022
Externally publishedYes

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Education
  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty

Keywords

  • interventionist research
  • multi-phase mixed methods
  • prevention
  • sexual violence

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Mixed Methods Community-Engaged Evaluation: Integrating Interventionist and Action Research Frameworks to Understand a Community-Building Violence Prevention Program'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this