TY - JOUR
T1 - Monetary sanctions
T2 - Legal financial obligations in US systems of justice
AU - Martin, Karin D.
AU - Sykes, Bryan L.
AU - Shannon, Sarah
AU - Edwards, Frank
AU - Harris, Alexes
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright c 2018 by Annual Reviews. All rights reserved.
PY - 2018
Y1 - 2018
N2 - This review assesses the current state of knowledge about monetary sanctions, e.g., fines, fees, surcharges, restitution, and any other financial liability related to contact with systems of justice, which are used more widely than prison, jail, probation, or parole in the United States. The review describes the most important consequences of the punishment of monetary sanctions in the United States, which include a significant capacity for exacerbating economic inequality by race, prolonged contact and involvement with the criminal justice system, driver’s license suspension, voting restrictions, damaged credit, and incarceration. Given the lack of consistent laws and policies that govern monetary sanctions, jurisdictions vary greatly in their imposition, enforcement, and collection practices of fines, fees, court costs, and restitution. A review of federally collected data on monetary sanctions reveals that a lack of consistent and exhaustive measures of monetary sanctions presents a unique problem for tracking both the prevalence and amount of legal financial obligations (LFOs) over time. We conclude with promising directions for future research and policy on monetary sanctions.
AB - This review assesses the current state of knowledge about monetary sanctions, e.g., fines, fees, surcharges, restitution, and any other financial liability related to contact with systems of justice, which are used more widely than prison, jail, probation, or parole in the United States. The review describes the most important consequences of the punishment of monetary sanctions in the United States, which include a significant capacity for exacerbating economic inequality by race, prolonged contact and involvement with the criminal justice system, driver’s license suspension, voting restrictions, damaged credit, and incarceration. Given the lack of consistent laws and policies that govern monetary sanctions, jurisdictions vary greatly in their imposition, enforcement, and collection practices of fines, fees, court costs, and restitution. A review of federally collected data on monetary sanctions reveals that a lack of consistent and exhaustive measures of monetary sanctions presents a unique problem for tracking both the prevalence and amount of legal financial obligations (LFOs) over time. We conclude with promising directions for future research and policy on monetary sanctions.
KW - Fines
KW - Legal financial obligations
KW - Monetary sanctions
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049173822&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85049173822&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1146/annurev-criminol-032317-091915
DO - 10.1146/annurev-criminol-032317-091915
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85049173822
VL - 1
SP - 497
EP - 515
JO - Annual Review of Criminology
JF - Annual Review of Criminology
SN - 2572-4568
ER -