Multiple chemical sensitivity syndrome: A clinical perspective: I. case definition, theories of pathogenesis, and research needs

Patricia J. Sparks, William Daniell, Donald W. Black, Howard M. Kipen, Leonard C. Altman, Gregory E. Simon, Abba I. Terr

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

112 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Multiple chemical sensitivity syndrome (MCS) does not appear to fit established principles of toxicology. Yet social, political, and economic forces are demanding that MCS be defined medically, even though to date scientific studies have not identified pathogenic mechanisms for the condition or any objective diagnostic criteria. Consequently, a working definition of MCS can rely only on an individual’s subjective symptoms of distress and attribution to environmental exposures rather than currently measurable objective evidence of disease. Nevertheless, patients labeled with MCS are clearly distressed and many are functionally disabled. In this review, four theories of causation are explored: (1) MCS is a purely biologic/physical or psychophy-siologic reaction to low-level chemical exposures. (2) MCS symptoms may be elicited by low-level environmental chemical exposures, but the sensitivity is initiated by psychologic stress. (3) MCS is a misdiagnosis and chemical exposure is not the cause. The symptoms may be due to misdiagnosed physical or psychologic illness. (4) MCS is an illness belief system manifest by culturally shaped illness behavior. Areas for further research regarding the etiologies of MCS are suggested. Recognizing that the cause of the syndrome may be multifactorial, strategies are proposed for clinical evaluation and management in Part II of this manuscript using a biopsychosocial model of illness.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)718-730
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Occupational Medicine
Volume36
Issue number7
StatePublished - Jul 1994

Fingerprint

Multiple Chemical Sensitivity
Research
Environmental Exposure
Diagnostic Errors
Illness Behavior
Biological Products
Psychological Stress
Causality
Toxicology
Economics

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Sparks, Patricia J. ; Daniell, William ; Black, Donald W. ; Kipen, Howard M. ; Altman, Leonard C. ; Simon, Gregory E. ; Terr, Abba I. / Multiple chemical sensitivity syndrome : A clinical perspective: I. case definition, theories of pathogenesis, and research needs. In: Journal of Occupational Medicine. 1994 ; Vol. 36, No. 7. pp. 718-730.
@article{c1f2c92cd54b4c95b5509816d1c92a39,
title = "Multiple chemical sensitivity syndrome: A clinical perspective: I. case definition, theories of pathogenesis, and research needs",
abstract = "Multiple chemical sensitivity syndrome (MCS) does not appear to fit established principles of toxicology. Yet social, political, and economic forces are demanding that MCS be defined medically, even though to date scientific studies have not identified pathogenic mechanisms for the condition or any objective diagnostic criteria. Consequently, a working definition of MCS can rely only on an individual’s subjective symptoms of distress and attribution to environmental exposures rather than currently measurable objective evidence of disease. Nevertheless, patients labeled with MCS are clearly distressed and many are functionally disabled. In this review, four theories of causation are explored: (1) MCS is a purely biologic/physical or psychophy-siologic reaction to low-level chemical exposures. (2) MCS symptoms may be elicited by low-level environmental chemical exposures, but the sensitivity is initiated by psychologic stress. (3) MCS is a misdiagnosis and chemical exposure is not the cause. The symptoms may be due to misdiagnosed physical or psychologic illness. (4) MCS is an illness belief system manifest by culturally shaped illness behavior. Areas for further research regarding the etiologies of MCS are suggested. Recognizing that the cause of the syndrome may be multifactorial, strategies are proposed for clinical evaluation and management in Part II of this manuscript using a biopsychosocial model of illness.",
author = "Sparks, {Patricia J.} and William Daniell and Black, {Donald W.} and Kipen, {Howard M.} and Altman, {Leonard C.} and Simon, {Gregory E.} and Terr, {Abba I.}",
year = "1994",
month = "7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "36",
pages = "718--730",
journal = "Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine",
issn = "1076-2752",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "7",

}

Multiple chemical sensitivity syndrome : A clinical perspective: I. case definition, theories of pathogenesis, and research needs. / Sparks, Patricia J.; Daniell, William; Black, Donald W.; Kipen, Howard M.; Altman, Leonard C.; Simon, Gregory E.; Terr, Abba I.

In: Journal of Occupational Medicine, Vol. 36, No. 7, 07.1994, p. 718-730.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Multiple chemical sensitivity syndrome

T2 - A clinical perspective: I. case definition, theories of pathogenesis, and research needs

AU - Sparks, Patricia J.

AU - Daniell, William

AU - Black, Donald W.

AU - Kipen, Howard M.

AU - Altman, Leonard C.

AU - Simon, Gregory E.

AU - Terr, Abba I.

PY - 1994/7

Y1 - 1994/7

N2 - Multiple chemical sensitivity syndrome (MCS) does not appear to fit established principles of toxicology. Yet social, political, and economic forces are demanding that MCS be defined medically, even though to date scientific studies have not identified pathogenic mechanisms for the condition or any objective diagnostic criteria. Consequently, a working definition of MCS can rely only on an individual’s subjective symptoms of distress and attribution to environmental exposures rather than currently measurable objective evidence of disease. Nevertheless, patients labeled with MCS are clearly distressed and many are functionally disabled. In this review, four theories of causation are explored: (1) MCS is a purely biologic/physical or psychophy-siologic reaction to low-level chemical exposures. (2) MCS symptoms may be elicited by low-level environmental chemical exposures, but the sensitivity is initiated by psychologic stress. (3) MCS is a misdiagnosis and chemical exposure is not the cause. The symptoms may be due to misdiagnosed physical or psychologic illness. (4) MCS is an illness belief system manifest by culturally shaped illness behavior. Areas for further research regarding the etiologies of MCS are suggested. Recognizing that the cause of the syndrome may be multifactorial, strategies are proposed for clinical evaluation and management in Part II of this manuscript using a biopsychosocial model of illness.

AB - Multiple chemical sensitivity syndrome (MCS) does not appear to fit established principles of toxicology. Yet social, political, and economic forces are demanding that MCS be defined medically, even though to date scientific studies have not identified pathogenic mechanisms for the condition or any objective diagnostic criteria. Consequently, a working definition of MCS can rely only on an individual’s subjective symptoms of distress and attribution to environmental exposures rather than currently measurable objective evidence of disease. Nevertheless, patients labeled with MCS are clearly distressed and many are functionally disabled. In this review, four theories of causation are explored: (1) MCS is a purely biologic/physical or psychophy-siologic reaction to low-level chemical exposures. (2) MCS symptoms may be elicited by low-level environmental chemical exposures, but the sensitivity is initiated by psychologic stress. (3) MCS is a misdiagnosis and chemical exposure is not the cause. The symptoms may be due to misdiagnosed physical or psychologic illness. (4) MCS is an illness belief system manifest by culturally shaped illness behavior. Areas for further research regarding the etiologies of MCS are suggested. Recognizing that the cause of the syndrome may be multifactorial, strategies are proposed for clinical evaluation and management in Part II of this manuscript using a biopsychosocial model of illness.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028245886&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028245886&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 7931736

AN - SCOPUS:0028245886

VL - 36

SP - 718

EP - 730

JO - Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine

JF - Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine

SN - 1076-2752

IS - 7

ER -