Neither Naïve nor critical reconstruction: Dispute mediators, impasse, and the design of argumentation

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

41 Scopus citations

Abstract

This study investigates how dispute-mediators handle impasse in the renegotiation of divorce decrees by divorced couples. Three sources of impasse and three strategies for handling impasse are identified based on analysis of mediation transcripts. The concern here lies not so much in the disputant's arguments but in the discussion procedures dispute-mediators use to craft the disputant's argumentation into a tool to solve conflict. Their moves are understood here as a practice of reconstructing argumentative discourse that is neither naïve nor critical but reconstruction as design. Mediator's reconstruction reveals a type of communication work in contemporary societies involved in the crafting of forums and formats that mediate argumentative communication. This work is often invisible and strategic which makes its interpretation, judgment, and development a challenge for pragma-dialectical theory. How reconstruction as design can be understood is discussed by building on prior pragma-dialectical theory and research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)265-290
Number of pages26
JournalArgumentation
Volume17
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2003

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Philosophy
  • Linguistics and Language

Keywords

  • Argument strategy
  • Conflict
  • Dialogue formats
  • Dispute mediation
  • Impasse
  • Reconstruction
  • Third-parties

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Neither Naïve nor critical reconstruction: Dispute mediators, impasse, and the design of argumentation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this