TY - JOUR
T1 - Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy With Oxaliplatin and Fluoropyrimidine Versus Upfront Surgery for Locally Advanced Colon Cancer
T2 - The Randomized, Phase III OPTICAL Trial
AU - The OPTICAL study group
AU - Hu, Huabin
AU - Zhang, Jianwei
AU - Li, Yunfeng
AU - Wang, Xiaozhong
AU - Wang, Ziqiang
AU - Wang, Hui
AU - Kang, Liang
AU - Liu, Ping
AU - Lan, Ping
AU - Wu, Xiaojian
AU - Zhen, Yunhuan
AU - Pei, Haiping
AU - Huang, Zhongcheng
AU - Zhang, Hao
AU - Chen, Wenbin
AU - Zeng, Yongming
AU - Lai, Jiajun
AU - Wei, Hongbo
AU - Huang, Xuefeng
AU - Chen, Jiansi
AU - Chen, Jigui
AU - Tao, Kaixiong
AU - Xu, Qingwen
AU - Peng, Xiang
AU - Liang, Junlin
AU - Cai, Guanfu
AU - Ding, Kefeng
AU - Ding, Zhijie
AU - Hu, Ming
AU - Zhang, Wei
AU - Tang, Bo
AU - Hong, Chuyuan
AU - Cao, Jie
AU - Huang, Zonghai
AU - Cao, Wuteng
AU - Li, Fangqian
AU - Wang, Xinhua
AU - Wang, Chao
AU - Huang, Yan
AU - Zhao, Yandong
AU - Cai, Yue
AU - Ling, Jiayu
AU - Xie, Xiaoyu
AU - Wu, Zehua
AU - Shi, Lishuo
AU - Ling, Li
AU - Liu, Hao
AU - Wang, Jianping
AU - Huang, Meijin
AU - Deng, Yanhong
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.
PY - 2024/9/1
Y1 - 2024/9/1
N2 - PURPOSE The role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in colon cancer remains unclear. This trial investigated whether 3 months of modified infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (mFOLFOX6) or capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CAPOX) as NAC could improve outcomes in patients with locally advanced colon cancer versus upfront surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS OPTICAL was a randomized, phase III trial in patients with clinically staged locally advanced colon cancer (T3 with extramural spread into themesocolic fat .5 mmor T4). Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive six preoperative cycles of mFOLFOX6 or four cycles of CAPOX, followed by surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy (NAC group), or immediate surgery and the physician's choice of adjuvant chemotherapy (upfront surgery group). The primary end pointwas 3-year diseasefree survival (DFS) assessed in themodified intention-to-treat (mITT) population. RESULTS Between January 2016 and April 2021, of the 752 patients enrolled, 744 patients were included in the mITT analysis (371 in the NAC group; 373 in the upfront surgery group). At a median follow-up of 48.0 months (IQR, 46.0-50.1), 3-year DFS rates were 82.1% in the NAC group and 77.5% in the upfront surgery group (stratified hazard ratio [HR], 0.74 [95% CI, 0.54 to 1.03]). The R0 resection was achieved in 98% of patients who underwent surgery in both groups. Compared with upfront surgery, NAC resulted in a 7% pathologic complete response rate (pCR), significantly lower rates of advanced tumor staging (pT3-4: 77% v 94%), lymph node metastasis (pN1-2: 31% v 46%), and potentially improved overall survival (stratified HR, 0.44 [95% CI, 0.25 to 0.77]). CONCLUSION NAC with mFOLFOX6 or CAPOX did not show a significant DFS benefit. However, this neoadjuvant approach was safe, resulted in substantial pathologic downstaging, and appears to be a viable therapeutic option for locally advanced colon cancer.
AB - PURPOSE The role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in colon cancer remains unclear. This trial investigated whether 3 months of modified infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (mFOLFOX6) or capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CAPOX) as NAC could improve outcomes in patients with locally advanced colon cancer versus upfront surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS OPTICAL was a randomized, phase III trial in patients with clinically staged locally advanced colon cancer (T3 with extramural spread into themesocolic fat .5 mmor T4). Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive six preoperative cycles of mFOLFOX6 or four cycles of CAPOX, followed by surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy (NAC group), or immediate surgery and the physician's choice of adjuvant chemotherapy (upfront surgery group). The primary end pointwas 3-year diseasefree survival (DFS) assessed in themodified intention-to-treat (mITT) population. RESULTS Between January 2016 and April 2021, of the 752 patients enrolled, 744 patients were included in the mITT analysis (371 in the NAC group; 373 in the upfront surgery group). At a median follow-up of 48.0 months (IQR, 46.0-50.1), 3-year DFS rates were 82.1% in the NAC group and 77.5% in the upfront surgery group (stratified hazard ratio [HR], 0.74 [95% CI, 0.54 to 1.03]). The R0 resection was achieved in 98% of patients who underwent surgery in both groups. Compared with upfront surgery, NAC resulted in a 7% pathologic complete response rate (pCR), significantly lower rates of advanced tumor staging (pT3-4: 77% v 94%), lymph node metastasis (pN1-2: 31% v 46%), and potentially improved overall survival (stratified HR, 0.44 [95% CI, 0.25 to 0.77]). CONCLUSION NAC with mFOLFOX6 or CAPOX did not show a significant DFS benefit. However, this neoadjuvant approach was safe, resulted in substantial pathologic downstaging, and appears to be a viable therapeutic option for locally advanced colon cancer.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85199777154
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85199777154#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1200/JCO.23.01889
DO - 10.1200/JCO.23.01889
M3 - Article
C2 - 38564700
AN - SCOPUS:85199777154
SN - 0732-183X
VL - 42
SP - 2978
EP - 2988
JO - Journal of Clinical Oncology
JF - Journal of Clinical Oncology
IS - 25
ER -