TY - JOUR
T1 - New framework reveals gaps in US ocean biodiversity protection
AU - Gignoux-Wolfsohn, Sarah A.
AU - Dunn, Daniel C.
AU - Cleary, Jesse
AU - Halpin, Patrick N.
AU - Anderson, Clarissa R.
AU - Bax, Nicholas J.
AU - Canonico, Gabrielle
AU - Chaniotis, Peter
AU - DeLand, Sarah
AU - Diorio, Mimi
AU - Gaines, Steven D.
AU - Grorud-Colvert, Kirsten
AU - Johnson, David E.
AU - Levin, Lisa A.
AU - Lundquist, Carolyn J.
AU - Manca, Eleonora
AU - Metaxas, Anna
AU - Monaco, Mark E.
AU - Morgan, Lance
AU - Mumby, Peter J.
AU - Nisthar, Dina
AU - Pashkow, Brittany
AU - Pike, Elizabeth P.
AU - Pinsky, Malin L.
AU - Ribera, Marta M.
AU - Stanley, Ryan R.E.
AU - Sullivan-Stack, Jenna
AU - Sutton, Tracey T.
AU - Tittensor, Derek P.
AU - Weatherdon, Lauren V.
AU - Wenzel, Lauren
AU - Duffy, J. Emmett
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Authors
PY - 2024/1/19
Y1 - 2024/1/19
N2 - Human activities threaten Earth's biodiversity and its contributions to human well-being. In the ocean, our poor understanding of how biodiversity is distributed limits its management and protection, necessitating reliance on weak abiotic proxies. Here, we propose a scientific framework for assessing marine biodiversity at multiple spatial scales, which exposes gaps in biodiversity knowledge and protection. The framework prioritizes ecologically and societally important taxa, characteristics of effective networks, and existing data. Applying the framework to assess biodiversity inside and outside US marine protected areas, we reveal that these areas contain a fraction of the biodiversity found in US waters. We show that none of the nation's 24 marine ecoregions meet all criteria for an effective protection network and that biodiversity coverage in protected areas varies among regions and taxa. This marine biodiversity assessment highlights concrete recommendations for more strategic protection and validates a scientific framework generalizable to other spatial management uses.
AB - Human activities threaten Earth's biodiversity and its contributions to human well-being. In the ocean, our poor understanding of how biodiversity is distributed limits its management and protection, necessitating reliance on weak abiotic proxies. Here, we propose a scientific framework for assessing marine biodiversity at multiple spatial scales, which exposes gaps in biodiversity knowledge and protection. The framework prioritizes ecologically and societally important taxa, characteristics of effective networks, and existing data. Applying the framework to assess biodiversity inside and outside US marine protected areas, we reveal that these areas contain a fraction of the biodiversity found in US waters. We show that none of the nation's 24 marine ecoregions meet all criteria for an effective protection network and that biodiversity coverage in protected areas varies among regions and taxa. This marine biodiversity assessment highlights concrete recommendations for more strategic protection and validates a scientific framework generalizable to other spatial management uses.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85182010250&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85182010250&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.oneear.2023.12.014
DO - 10.1016/j.oneear.2023.12.014
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85182010250
SN - 2590-3330
VL - 7
SP - 31
EP - 43
JO - One Earth
JF - One Earth
IS - 1
ER -