NFIB vs Sebelius

The political expediency of the Roberts court

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)
Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)119-124
Number of pages6
JournalHealth Economics, Policy and Law
Volume8
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Supreme Court Decisions
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
Health Care Reform
Politics

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Health Policy

Cite this

@article{bbd639b6db0542c1a8f6b133b43f6b3b,
title = "NFIB vs Sebelius: The political expediency of the Roberts court",
author = "Michael Gusmano",
year = "2013",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/S1744133112000382",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
pages = "119--124",
journal = "Health Economics, Policy and Law",
issn = "1744-1331",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "1",

}

NFIB vs Sebelius : The political expediency of the Roberts court. / Gusmano, Michael.

In: Health Economics, Policy and Law, Vol. 8, No. 1, 01.01.2013, p. 119-124.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - NFIB vs Sebelius

T2 - The political expediency of the Roberts court

AU - Gusmano, Michael

PY - 2013/1/1

Y1 - 2013/1/1

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84872948630&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84872948630&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S1744133112000382

DO - 10.1017/S1744133112000382

M3 - Article

VL - 8

SP - 119

EP - 124

JO - Health Economics, Policy and Law

JF - Health Economics, Policy and Law

SN - 1744-1331

IS - 1

ER -