Non-ideal measurements

David Albert, Barry Loewer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We have previously objected to modal interpretations of quantum theory by showing that these interpretations do not assign outcomes to non-ideal measurements. Bub and Healey replied (in this journal) by offering alternative accounts of non-ideal measurements. In this paper we argue, first, that our account of non-ideal measurements is correct and, second, even if it is not correct, it is overwhelmingly likely that interactions satisfying our characterization of non-ideal measurements actually occur and that such interactions possess outcomes. A successful defense of the modal interpretation must assign outcomes to these interactions or show that they do not have outcomes or show that in fact they never occur. Bub and Healey show none of this.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)297-305
Number of pages9
JournalFoundations of Physics Letters
Volume6
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 1993

Fingerprint

interactions
quantum theory

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Physics and Astronomy(all)

Keywords

  • foundations of quantum theory
  • non-ideal measurements
  • the measurement problem
  • the modal interpretation

Cite this

Albert, David ; Loewer, Barry. / Non-ideal measurements. In: Foundations of Physics Letters. 1993 ; Vol. 6, No. 4. pp. 297-305.
@article{27bd3989f4f845b8a8643eec3a60c146,
title = "Non-ideal measurements",
abstract = "We have previously objected to modal interpretations of quantum theory by showing that these interpretations do not assign outcomes to non-ideal measurements. Bub and Healey replied (in this journal) by offering alternative accounts of non-ideal measurements. In this paper we argue, first, that our account of non-ideal measurements is correct and, second, even if it is not correct, it is overwhelmingly likely that interactions satisfying our characterization of non-ideal measurements actually occur and that such interactions possess outcomes. A successful defense of the modal interpretation must assign outcomes to these interactions or show that they do not have outcomes or show that in fact they never occur. Bub and Healey show none of this.",
keywords = "foundations of quantum theory, non-ideal measurements, the measurement problem, the modal interpretation",
author = "David Albert and Barry Loewer",
year = "1993",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/BF00665649",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
pages = "297--305",
journal = "Foundations of Physics Letters",
issn = "0894-9875",
publisher = "Plenum Press",
number = "4",

}

Albert, D & Loewer, B 1993, 'Non-ideal measurements', Foundations of Physics Letters, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 297-305. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00665649

Non-ideal measurements. / Albert, David; Loewer, Barry.

In: Foundations of Physics Letters, Vol. 6, No. 4, 01.08.1993, p. 297-305.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Non-ideal measurements

AU - Albert, David

AU - Loewer, Barry

PY - 1993/8/1

Y1 - 1993/8/1

N2 - We have previously objected to modal interpretations of quantum theory by showing that these interpretations do not assign outcomes to non-ideal measurements. Bub and Healey replied (in this journal) by offering alternative accounts of non-ideal measurements. In this paper we argue, first, that our account of non-ideal measurements is correct and, second, even if it is not correct, it is overwhelmingly likely that interactions satisfying our characterization of non-ideal measurements actually occur and that such interactions possess outcomes. A successful defense of the modal interpretation must assign outcomes to these interactions or show that they do not have outcomes or show that in fact they never occur. Bub and Healey show none of this.

AB - We have previously objected to modal interpretations of quantum theory by showing that these interpretations do not assign outcomes to non-ideal measurements. Bub and Healey replied (in this journal) by offering alternative accounts of non-ideal measurements. In this paper we argue, first, that our account of non-ideal measurements is correct and, second, even if it is not correct, it is overwhelmingly likely that interactions satisfying our characterization of non-ideal measurements actually occur and that such interactions possess outcomes. A successful defense of the modal interpretation must assign outcomes to these interactions or show that they do not have outcomes or show that in fact they never occur. Bub and Healey show none of this.

KW - foundations of quantum theory

KW - non-ideal measurements

KW - the measurement problem

KW - the modal interpretation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34250073852&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34250073852&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/BF00665649

DO - 10.1007/BF00665649

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:34250073852

VL - 6

SP - 297

EP - 305

JO - Foundations of Physics Letters

JF - Foundations of Physics Letters

SN - 0894-9875

IS - 4

ER -