TY - JOUR
T1 - Numerical simulation of crossing-shock-wave/turbulent-boundary-layer interaction using a two-equation model of turbulence
AU - Knight, D.
AU - Gnedin, M.
AU - Becht, R.
AU - Zheltovodov, A.
PY - 2000/4/25
Y1 - 2000/4/25
N2 - A crossing-shock-wave/turbulent-boundary-layer interaction is investigated using the k-ε turbulence model with a new low-Reynolds-number model based on the approach of Saffman (1970) and Speziale et al. (1990). The crossing shocks are generated by two wedge-shaped fins with wedge angles α1 and α2 attached normal to a flat plate on which an equilibrium supersonic turbulent boundary layer has developed. Two configurations, corresponding to the experiments of Zheltovodov et al. (1994, 1998a,b), are considered. The free-stream Mach number is 3.9, and the fin angles are (α1, α2) = (7°, 7°) and (7°, 11°). The computed surface pressure displays very good agreement with experiment. The computed surface skin friction lines are in close agreement with experiment for the initial separation, and are in qualitative agreement within the crossing shock interaction region. The computed heat transfer is in good agreement with experiment for the (α1, α2) = (7°, 7°) configuration. For the (α1, α2) = (7°, 11°) configuration, the heat transfer is significantly overpredicted within the three-dimensional interaction. The adiabatic wall temperature is accurately predicted for both configurations.
AB - A crossing-shock-wave/turbulent-boundary-layer interaction is investigated using the k-ε turbulence model with a new low-Reynolds-number model based on the approach of Saffman (1970) and Speziale et al. (1990). The crossing shocks are generated by two wedge-shaped fins with wedge angles α1 and α2 attached normal to a flat plate on which an equilibrium supersonic turbulent boundary layer has developed. Two configurations, corresponding to the experiments of Zheltovodov et al. (1994, 1998a,b), are considered. The free-stream Mach number is 3.9, and the fin angles are (α1, α2) = (7°, 7°) and (7°, 11°). The computed surface pressure displays very good agreement with experiment. The computed surface skin friction lines are in close agreement with experiment for the initial separation, and are in qualitative agreement within the crossing shock interaction region. The computed heat transfer is in good agreement with experiment for the (α1, α2) = (7°, 7°) configuration. For the (α1, α2) = (7°, 11°) configuration, the heat transfer is significantly overpredicted within the three-dimensional interaction. The adiabatic wall temperature is accurately predicted for both configurations.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033941904&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033941904&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1017/S0022112099007764
DO - 10.1017/S0022112099007764
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0033941904
SN - 0022-1120
VL - 409
SP - 121
EP - 147
JO - Journal of Fluid Mechanics
JF - Journal of Fluid Mechanics
ER -