Occult sleep apnea: The dilemma of negative polysomnography in symptomatic patients

Deborah A. Hutter, Bart Holland, Hormoz Ashtyani

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background and purpose: To determine the benefit of repeat polysomnography with/without esophageal pressure (PES) monitoring to diagnose sleep apnea syndrome (SAS) in patients with symptoms of sleep apnea who have had a "negative", single-night polysomnogram (PSG). Patients and methods: This is a retrospective investigation of 1187 patients seen in our sleep lab from January to December 2001, of which 709 were adults suspected of having sleep apnea. Following a single PSG, 588 patients were diagnosed with sleep apnea and 121 had negative PSGs (an apnea-hypopnea index <5 events per hour). Of the 121 patients, 92 continued to complain of unexplained sleepiness, loud snoring, or apnea, symptoms which were also documented on their initial evaluation (PSG or multiple sleep latency testing). The remaining 29 patients had no further complaints, or another medical cause of their sleepiness was established (i.e. asthma) following the single-night PSG. Of the 92 patients, 28 underwent additional screening with both repeat PSG and PES monitoring within the following 6 months. Results: With repeat PSG and PES monitoring, 18 of the 28 patients with previous, negative PSGs were diagnosed with sleep apnea. The sensitivity of a single-night PSG fell to 97%, with a false negative rate of 3%. Only 12 of the 28 would have been positive based on polysomnographic criteria alone, without the additional PES monitoring. On the other hand, 10 of the 28 remained negative and further evaluation revealed other, underlying medical problems (i.e. nocturnal asthma) that explained their symptoms. Conclusions: There is a clear benefit of repeat PSG, with or without PES monitoring, for patients with a prior negative PSG and continued symptoms suspected of having SAS.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)501-506
Number of pages6
JournalSleep Medicine
Volume5
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2004

Fingerprint

Polysomnography
Sleep Apnea Syndromes
Pressure
Apnea
Sleep
Asthma
Snoring
Physiologic Monitoring

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Medicine(all)

Keywords

  • Esophageal pressure monitoring
  • Negative polysomnography
  • Obstructive apnea
  • Second night
  • Sleepiness
  • Snoring
  • Upper airway resistance

Cite this

Hutter, Deborah A. ; Holland, Bart ; Ashtyani, Hormoz. / Occult sleep apnea : The dilemma of negative polysomnography in symptomatic patients. In: Sleep Medicine. 2004 ; Vol. 5, No. 5. pp. 501-506.
@article{af9e0e413488479ebcb59835a59be0bf,
title = "Occult sleep apnea: The dilemma of negative polysomnography in symptomatic patients",
abstract = "Background and purpose: To determine the benefit of repeat polysomnography with/without esophageal pressure (PES) monitoring to diagnose sleep apnea syndrome (SAS) in patients with symptoms of sleep apnea who have had a {"}negative{"}, single-night polysomnogram (PSG). Patients and methods: This is a retrospective investigation of 1187 patients seen in our sleep lab from January to December 2001, of which 709 were adults suspected of having sleep apnea. Following a single PSG, 588 patients were diagnosed with sleep apnea and 121 had negative PSGs (an apnea-hypopnea index <5 events per hour). Of the 121 patients, 92 continued to complain of unexplained sleepiness, loud snoring, or apnea, symptoms which were also documented on their initial evaluation (PSG or multiple sleep latency testing). The remaining 29 patients had no further complaints, or another medical cause of their sleepiness was established (i.e. asthma) following the single-night PSG. Of the 92 patients, 28 underwent additional screening with both repeat PSG and PES monitoring within the following 6 months. Results: With repeat PSG and PES monitoring, 18 of the 28 patients with previous, negative PSGs were diagnosed with sleep apnea. The sensitivity of a single-night PSG fell to 97{\%}, with a false negative rate of 3{\%}. Only 12 of the 28 would have been positive based on polysomnographic criteria alone, without the additional PES monitoring. On the other hand, 10 of the 28 remained negative and further evaluation revealed other, underlying medical problems (i.e. nocturnal asthma) that explained their symptoms. Conclusions: There is a clear benefit of repeat PSG, with or without PES monitoring, for patients with a prior negative PSG and continued symptoms suspected of having SAS.",
keywords = "Esophageal pressure monitoring, Negative polysomnography, Obstructive apnea, Second night, Sleepiness, Snoring, Upper airway resistance",
author = "Hutter, {Deborah A.} and Bart Holland and Hormoz Ashtyani",
year = "2004",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.sleep.2004.05.005",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
pages = "501--506",
journal = "Sleep Medicine",
issn = "1389-9457",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "5",

}

Occult sleep apnea : The dilemma of negative polysomnography in symptomatic patients. / Hutter, Deborah A.; Holland, Bart; Ashtyani, Hormoz.

In: Sleep Medicine, Vol. 5, No. 5, 01.09.2004, p. 501-506.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Occult sleep apnea

T2 - The dilemma of negative polysomnography in symptomatic patients

AU - Hutter, Deborah A.

AU - Holland, Bart

AU - Ashtyani, Hormoz

PY - 2004/9/1

Y1 - 2004/9/1

N2 - Background and purpose: To determine the benefit of repeat polysomnography with/without esophageal pressure (PES) monitoring to diagnose sleep apnea syndrome (SAS) in patients with symptoms of sleep apnea who have had a "negative", single-night polysomnogram (PSG). Patients and methods: This is a retrospective investigation of 1187 patients seen in our sleep lab from January to December 2001, of which 709 were adults suspected of having sleep apnea. Following a single PSG, 588 patients were diagnosed with sleep apnea and 121 had negative PSGs (an apnea-hypopnea index <5 events per hour). Of the 121 patients, 92 continued to complain of unexplained sleepiness, loud snoring, or apnea, symptoms which were also documented on their initial evaluation (PSG or multiple sleep latency testing). The remaining 29 patients had no further complaints, or another medical cause of their sleepiness was established (i.e. asthma) following the single-night PSG. Of the 92 patients, 28 underwent additional screening with both repeat PSG and PES monitoring within the following 6 months. Results: With repeat PSG and PES monitoring, 18 of the 28 patients with previous, negative PSGs were diagnosed with sleep apnea. The sensitivity of a single-night PSG fell to 97%, with a false negative rate of 3%. Only 12 of the 28 would have been positive based on polysomnographic criteria alone, without the additional PES monitoring. On the other hand, 10 of the 28 remained negative and further evaluation revealed other, underlying medical problems (i.e. nocturnal asthma) that explained their symptoms. Conclusions: There is a clear benefit of repeat PSG, with or without PES monitoring, for patients with a prior negative PSG and continued symptoms suspected of having SAS.

AB - Background and purpose: To determine the benefit of repeat polysomnography with/without esophageal pressure (PES) monitoring to diagnose sleep apnea syndrome (SAS) in patients with symptoms of sleep apnea who have had a "negative", single-night polysomnogram (PSG). Patients and methods: This is a retrospective investigation of 1187 patients seen in our sleep lab from January to December 2001, of which 709 were adults suspected of having sleep apnea. Following a single PSG, 588 patients were diagnosed with sleep apnea and 121 had negative PSGs (an apnea-hypopnea index <5 events per hour). Of the 121 patients, 92 continued to complain of unexplained sleepiness, loud snoring, or apnea, symptoms which were also documented on their initial evaluation (PSG or multiple sleep latency testing). The remaining 29 patients had no further complaints, or another medical cause of their sleepiness was established (i.e. asthma) following the single-night PSG. Of the 92 patients, 28 underwent additional screening with both repeat PSG and PES monitoring within the following 6 months. Results: With repeat PSG and PES monitoring, 18 of the 28 patients with previous, negative PSGs were diagnosed with sleep apnea. The sensitivity of a single-night PSG fell to 97%, with a false negative rate of 3%. Only 12 of the 28 would have been positive based on polysomnographic criteria alone, without the additional PES monitoring. On the other hand, 10 of the 28 remained negative and further evaluation revealed other, underlying medical problems (i.e. nocturnal asthma) that explained their symptoms. Conclusions: There is a clear benefit of repeat PSG, with or without PES monitoring, for patients with a prior negative PSG and continued symptoms suspected of having SAS.

KW - Esophageal pressure monitoring

KW - Negative polysomnography

KW - Obstructive apnea

KW - Second night

KW - Sleepiness

KW - Snoring

KW - Upper airway resistance

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=4444357066&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=4444357066&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.sleep.2004.05.005

DO - 10.1016/j.sleep.2004.05.005

M3 - Article

C2 - 15341897

AN - SCOPUS:4444357066

VL - 5

SP - 501

EP - 506

JO - Sleep Medicine

JF - Sleep Medicine

SN - 1389-9457

IS - 5

ER -