TY - JOUR
T1 - On the parameterized complexity of approximating dominating set
AU - Karthik, C. S.
AU - Laekhanukit, Bundit
AU - Manurangsi, Pasin
N1 - Funding Information:
Karthik C. S. is supported by ERC-CoG grant no. 772839, BSF grant no. 2014371, and ISF-UGC grant no. 1399/14. Bundit Laekhanukit is partially supported by ISF grant no. 621/12, I-CORE grant no. 4/11 and by the DIMACS/Simons Collaboration on Bridging Continuous and Discrete Optimization through NSF grant no. CCF-1740425. Pasin Manurangsi is supported by NSF grants no. CCF 1540685 and CCF 1655215, and by ISF-UGC grant no. 1399/14. Parts of the work were done while all the authors were at the Weizmann Institute of Science and while the second author was visiting the Simons Institute for the Theory of Computing. Authors’ addresses: Karthik C. S., Department of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, Weizmann Institute of Science, 234 Herzl street, Rehovot, Israel - 7610001; email: karthik.srikanta@weizmann.ac.il; B. Laekhanukit, Institute for Theoretical Computer Science, School of Information Management and Engineering, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, 100 Wudong Street, Yangpu, Shanghai, 200433 China; email: bundit@sufe.edu.cn; P. Manurangsi, Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, UC Berkeley, CA 94720, USA; email: pasin@berkeley.edu. Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from permissions@acm.org. © 2019 Association for Computing Machinery. 0004-5411/2019/08-ART33 $15.00 https://doi.org/10.1145/3325116
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Association for Computing Machinery.
PY - 2019/9
Y1 - 2019/9
N2 - We study the parameterized complexity of approximating the k-Dominating Set (DomSet) problem where an integer k and a graph G on n vertices are given as input, and the goal is to find a dominating set of size at most F(k) · k whenever the graph G has a dominating set of size k. When such an algorithm runs in time T(k) · poly(n) (i.e., FPT-time) for some computable function T, it is said to be an F(k)-FPT-approximation algorithm for k-DomSet. Whether such an algorithm exists is listed in the seminal book of Downey and Fellows (2013) as one of the “most infamous” open problems in parameterized complexity. This work gives an almost complete answer to this question by showing the non-existence of such an algorithm under W[1] = FPT and further providing tighter running time lower bounds under stronger hypotheses. Specifically, we prove the following for every computable functions T, F and every constant ε > 0: • Assuming W[1] FPT, there is no F(k)-FPT-approximation algorithm for k-DomSet. • Assuming the Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH), there is no F(k)-approximation algorithm for k-DomSet that runs in T(k) · no(k) time. • Assuming the Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis (SETH), for every integer k ≥ 2, there is no F(k)approximation algorithm for k-DomSet that runs in T(k) · nk−ε time. • Assuming the k-SUM Hypothesis, for every integer k ≥ 3, there is no F(k)-approximation algorithm for k-DomSet that runs in T(k) · n[k/2]−ε time. Previously, only constant ratio FPT-approximation algorithms were ruled out under W[1] = FPT and (log1/4−ε k)-FPT-approximation algorithms were ruled out under ETH [Chen and Lin, FOCS 2016]. Recently, the non-existence of an F(k)-FPT-approximation algorithm for any function F was shown under Gap-ETH [Chalermsook et al., FOCS 2017]. Note that, to the best of our knowledge, no running time lower bound of the form nδk for any absolute constant δ > 0 was known before even for any constant factor inapproximation ratio. Our results are obtained by establishing a connection between communication complexity and hardness of approximation, generalizing the ideas from a recent breakthrough work of Abboud et al. [FOCS 2017].
AB - We study the parameterized complexity of approximating the k-Dominating Set (DomSet) problem where an integer k and a graph G on n vertices are given as input, and the goal is to find a dominating set of size at most F(k) · k whenever the graph G has a dominating set of size k. When such an algorithm runs in time T(k) · poly(n) (i.e., FPT-time) for some computable function T, it is said to be an F(k)-FPT-approximation algorithm for k-DomSet. Whether such an algorithm exists is listed in the seminal book of Downey and Fellows (2013) as one of the “most infamous” open problems in parameterized complexity. This work gives an almost complete answer to this question by showing the non-existence of such an algorithm under W[1] = FPT and further providing tighter running time lower bounds under stronger hypotheses. Specifically, we prove the following for every computable functions T, F and every constant ε > 0: • Assuming W[1] FPT, there is no F(k)-FPT-approximation algorithm for k-DomSet. • Assuming the Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH), there is no F(k)-approximation algorithm for k-DomSet that runs in T(k) · no(k) time. • Assuming the Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis (SETH), for every integer k ≥ 2, there is no F(k)approximation algorithm for k-DomSet that runs in T(k) · nk−ε time. • Assuming the k-SUM Hypothesis, for every integer k ≥ 3, there is no F(k)-approximation algorithm for k-DomSet that runs in T(k) · n[k/2]−ε time. Previously, only constant ratio FPT-approximation algorithms were ruled out under W[1] = FPT and (log1/4−ε k)-FPT-approximation algorithms were ruled out under ETH [Chen and Lin, FOCS 2016]. Recently, the non-existence of an F(k)-FPT-approximation algorithm for any function F was shown under Gap-ETH [Chalermsook et al., FOCS 2017]. Note that, to the best of our knowledge, no running time lower bound of the form nδk for any absolute constant δ > 0 was known before even for any constant factor inapproximation ratio. Our results are obtained by establishing a connection between communication complexity and hardness of approximation, generalizing the ideas from a recent breakthrough work of Abboud et al. [FOCS 2017].
KW - Dominating set
KW - Parameterized inapproximability
KW - Set cover
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85074210854&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85074210854&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1145/3325116
DO - 10.1145/3325116
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85074210854
SN - 0004-5411
VL - 66
JO - Journal of the ACM
JF - Journal of the ACM
IS - 5
M1 - 33
ER -