Ostracism, resources, and the perception of human motion

Jamie L. Gorman, Kent D. Harber, Maggie Shiffrar, Karen S. Quigley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

Is perception of human motion affected by psychosocial resources? According to the Resources and Perception Model, perception is jointly affected by subjective threat and psychosocial resources that buffer threat. Two experiments tested whether social threat (i.e., ostracism) and psychosocial resources affect perception of human motion. Observers attempted to identify human movement in ambiguous point-light displays after being ostracized or not ostracized. Additionally, trait resources (self-esteem plus social support) were measured (Studies 1 and 2), and self-affirmation was manipulated (Study 2). Study 1 showed that ostracism reduced sensitivity for detecting human motion but not among people with ample trait resources. Study 2 replicated this ostracism-by-trait resources interaction. It also showed that self-affirmation improved human motion perception for all included participants but only benefited ostracized participants with ample trait resources. These studies show that a basic visual skill—detecting human motion—is jointly affected by social threats and psychosocial resources.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)53-71
Number of pages19
JournalEuropean Journal of Social Psychology
Volume47
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2017

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Social Psychology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Ostracism, resources, and the perception of human motion'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this