Outcome measures for acute and chronic gout

H. Ralph Schumacher, Lawrence N. Edwards, Fernando Perez-Ruiz, Michael Becker, Lan X. Chen, Daniel E. Furst, Nancy Joseph-Ridge, Naomi Schlesinger, Zeb Horowitz, Kenneth Saag, Judith A. Boice, Hisashi Yamanaka

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

66 Scopus citations

Abstract

Gout provides some unique challenges in classification and measurement of outcomes. Our aim was to evaluate criteria for classification and to develop and validate optimal instruments to measure outcomes for acute and chronic gout. A planning committee and interested attendees met to propose classification criteria and domains for outcomes. Seven of the current American Rheumatism Association preliminary criteria for classification were proposed as the best current criteria for acute gouty arthritis, pending further studies. The presence of gout is best established by crystal identification, although this technique has limitations. Five domains for acute gout outcomes and 9 for chronic gout were identified along with proposed instruments for testing and validation. The unique problems of gout evaluation can and will be addressed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2452-2455
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Rheumatology
Volume32
Issue number12
StatePublished - Dec 2005

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Rheumatology
  • Immunology and Allergy
  • Immunology

Keywords

  • Classification
  • Gout
  • Instruments
  • Outcomes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Outcome measures for acute and chronic gout'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this