TY - JOUR
T1 - Patient perspectives on the linkage of health data for research
T2 - Insights from an online patient community questionnaire
AU - O'Brien, Emily C.
AU - Rodriguez, Ana Maria
AU - Kum, Hye Chung
AU - Schanberg, Laura E.
AU - Fitz-Randolph, Marcy
AU - O'Brien, Sean M.
AU - Setoguchi, Soko
N1 - Funding Information:
Research reported in this article was funded through a Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) Award ( ME-1310-08637 ). The statements presented in this article are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI), its Board of Governors or Methodology Committee.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019
PY - 2019/7
Y1 - 2019/7
N2 - Objective: To examine the patient perspective on the risks and benefits of linking existing data sources for research. Materials and methods: Between December 2015 and February 2016, we fielded a questionnaire in PatientsLikeMe, an online patient community representing over 2500 health conditions. The questionnaire was developed using subject matter expertise and patient feedback from a concept elicitation phase (N = 57 patients). The final questionnaire consisted of 37 items. Results: Of n = 5741 who opened the email invitation, n = 3516 respondents completed the questionnaire (61.2%). Of these, 73.8% were women, 86.4% were Caucasian, 14.5% were 65 or older, and 44.9% had completed college or post-graduate education. Questionnaire respondents indicated that the most important benefits of sharing data were “helping my doctor make better decisions about my health” (94%) and “helping make new therapies available faster” (94%). The most important data sharing risk identified was health data being “stolen by hackers” (87%). Of 693 patients who were not comfortable with researchers accessing their de-identified data, most reported that their comfort levels would increase if they were able to learn how their data was protected (84%). In general, responders felt more comfortable when unique identifiers such as social security number (90%) and insurance ID (82%) were removed from the data for linkage and research use. Discussion: The majority of patients in a US-based online community are comfortable with researchers accessing their de-identified data for research purposes. Conclusions: Developing methods to link databases minimizing the exposure of unique identifiers may improve patient comfort levels with linking data for research purposes.
AB - Objective: To examine the patient perspective on the risks and benefits of linking existing data sources for research. Materials and methods: Between December 2015 and February 2016, we fielded a questionnaire in PatientsLikeMe, an online patient community representing over 2500 health conditions. The questionnaire was developed using subject matter expertise and patient feedback from a concept elicitation phase (N = 57 patients). The final questionnaire consisted of 37 items. Results: Of n = 5741 who opened the email invitation, n = 3516 respondents completed the questionnaire (61.2%). Of these, 73.8% were women, 86.4% were Caucasian, 14.5% were 65 or older, and 44.9% had completed college or post-graduate education. Questionnaire respondents indicated that the most important benefits of sharing data were “helping my doctor make better decisions about my health” (94%) and “helping make new therapies available faster” (94%). The most important data sharing risk identified was health data being “stolen by hackers” (87%). Of 693 patients who were not comfortable with researchers accessing their de-identified data, most reported that their comfort levels would increase if they were able to learn how their data was protected (84%). In general, responders felt more comfortable when unique identifiers such as social security number (90%) and insurance ID (82%) were removed from the data for linkage and research use. Discussion: The majority of patients in a US-based online community are comfortable with researchers accessing their de-identified data for research purposes. Conclusions: Developing methods to link databases minimizing the exposure of unique identifiers may improve patient comfort levels with linking data for research purposes.
KW - Data linkage
KW - Ethics
KW - Patient-centered research
KW - Privacy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064318558&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85064318558&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.04.003
DO - 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.04.003
M3 - Article
C2 - 31128837
AN - SCOPUS:85064318558
SN - 1386-5056
VL - 127
SP - 9
EP - 17
JO - International Journal of Medical Informatics
JF - International Journal of Medical Informatics
ER -