Perfect being attacked! Jeff speaks’s the greatest possible being

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Jeff Speaks’s The Greatest Possible Being criticizes several sorts of perfect being theology. I show that his main discussions target what are really idealizations of actual perfect-being projects. I then focus on whether Speaks’s idealizations match up with the real historical article. I argue that, in one key respect, they do not and that it would be uncharitable to think that one of them does. If the idealizations do not represent what perfect being thinkers have actually been doing, a question arises about how much Speaks’s critique should worry those pursuing projects modelled on real historical perfect being theology.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)262-273
Number of pages12
JournalFaith and Philosophy
Volume38
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2021
Externally publishedYes

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Religious studies
  • Philosophy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Perfect being attacked! Jeff speaks’s the greatest possible being'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this