Poverty of the Stimulus Revisited

Robert C. Berwick, Paul Pietroski, Beracah Yankama, Noam Chomsky

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

88 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A central goal of modern generative grammar has been to discover invariant properties of human languages that reflect "the innate schematism of mind that is applied to the data of experience" and that "might reasonably be attributed to the organism itself as its contribution to the task of the acquisition of knowledge" (Chomsky, 1971). Candidates for such invariances include the structure dependence of grammatical rules, and in particular, certain constraints on question formation. Various "poverty of stimulus" (POS) arguments suggest that these invariances reflect an innate human endowment, as opposed to common experience: Such experience warrants selection of the grammars acquired only if humans assume, a priori, that selectable grammars respect substantive constraints. Recently, several researchers have tried to rebut these POS arguments. In response, we illustrate why POS arguments remain an important source of support for appeal to a priori structure-dependent constraints on the grammars that humans naturally acquire.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1207-1242
Number of pages36
JournalCognitive Science
Volume35
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2011

Fingerprint

Poverty
Invariance
Financial Management
Language
Research Personnel

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Artificial Intelligence

Keywords

  • Language acquisition
  • Linguistics
  • Statistics
  • Syntax

Cite this

Berwick, Robert C. ; Pietroski, Paul ; Yankama, Beracah ; Chomsky, Noam. / Poverty of the Stimulus Revisited. In: Cognitive Science. 2011 ; Vol. 35, No. 7. pp. 1207-1242.
@article{95a7ea64a6a84c558bd2c4f3d9e94a22,
title = "Poverty of the Stimulus Revisited",
abstract = "A central goal of modern generative grammar has been to discover invariant properties of human languages that reflect {"}the innate schematism of mind that is applied to the data of experience{"} and that {"}might reasonably be attributed to the organism itself as its contribution to the task of the acquisition of knowledge{"} (Chomsky, 1971). Candidates for such invariances include the structure dependence of grammatical rules, and in particular, certain constraints on question formation. Various {"}poverty of stimulus{"} (POS) arguments suggest that these invariances reflect an innate human endowment, as opposed to common experience: Such experience warrants selection of the grammars acquired only if humans assume, a priori, that selectable grammars respect substantive constraints. Recently, several researchers have tried to rebut these POS arguments. In response, we illustrate why POS arguments remain an important source of support for appeal to a priori structure-dependent constraints on the grammars that humans naturally acquire.",
keywords = "Language acquisition, Linguistics, Statistics, Syntax",
author = "Berwick, {Robert C.} and Paul Pietroski and Beracah Yankama and Noam Chomsky",
year = "2011",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01189.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "35",
pages = "1207--1242",
journal = "Cognitive Science",
issn = "0364-0213",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "7",

}

Berwick, RC, Pietroski, P, Yankama, B & Chomsky, N 2011, 'Poverty of the Stimulus Revisited', Cognitive Science, vol. 35, no. 7, pp. 1207-1242. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01189.x

Poverty of the Stimulus Revisited. / Berwick, Robert C.; Pietroski, Paul; Yankama, Beracah; Chomsky, Noam.

In: Cognitive Science, Vol. 35, No. 7, 01.09.2011, p. 1207-1242.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Poverty of the Stimulus Revisited

AU - Berwick, Robert C.

AU - Pietroski, Paul

AU - Yankama, Beracah

AU - Chomsky, Noam

PY - 2011/9/1

Y1 - 2011/9/1

N2 - A central goal of modern generative grammar has been to discover invariant properties of human languages that reflect "the innate schematism of mind that is applied to the data of experience" and that "might reasonably be attributed to the organism itself as its contribution to the task of the acquisition of knowledge" (Chomsky, 1971). Candidates for such invariances include the structure dependence of grammatical rules, and in particular, certain constraints on question formation. Various "poverty of stimulus" (POS) arguments suggest that these invariances reflect an innate human endowment, as opposed to common experience: Such experience warrants selection of the grammars acquired only if humans assume, a priori, that selectable grammars respect substantive constraints. Recently, several researchers have tried to rebut these POS arguments. In response, we illustrate why POS arguments remain an important source of support for appeal to a priori structure-dependent constraints on the grammars that humans naturally acquire.

AB - A central goal of modern generative grammar has been to discover invariant properties of human languages that reflect "the innate schematism of mind that is applied to the data of experience" and that "might reasonably be attributed to the organism itself as its contribution to the task of the acquisition of knowledge" (Chomsky, 1971). Candidates for such invariances include the structure dependence of grammatical rules, and in particular, certain constraints on question formation. Various "poverty of stimulus" (POS) arguments suggest that these invariances reflect an innate human endowment, as opposed to common experience: Such experience warrants selection of the grammars acquired only if humans assume, a priori, that selectable grammars respect substantive constraints. Recently, several researchers have tried to rebut these POS arguments. In response, we illustrate why POS arguments remain an important source of support for appeal to a priori structure-dependent constraints on the grammars that humans naturally acquire.

KW - Language acquisition

KW - Linguistics

KW - Statistics

KW - Syntax

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80052412470&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80052412470&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01189.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01189.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 21824178

AN - SCOPUS:80052412470

VL - 35

SP - 1207

EP - 1242

JO - Cognitive Science

JF - Cognitive Science

SN - 0364-0213

IS - 7

ER -