TY - JOUR
T1 - Prediction of Bridge Component Ratings Using Ordinal Logistic Regression Model
AU - Lu, Pan
AU - Wang, Hao
AU - Tolliver, Denver
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Pan Lu et al.
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - Prediction of bridge component condition is fundamental for well-informed decisions regarding the maintenance, repair, and rehabilitation (MRR) of highway bridges. The National Bridge Inventory (NBI) condition rating is a major source of bridge condition data in the United States. In this study, a type of generalized linear model (GLM), the ordinal logistic statistical model, is presented and compared with the traditional regression model. The proposed model is evaluated in terms of reliability (the ability of a model to accurately predict bridge component ratings or the agreement between predictions and actual observations) and model fitness. Five criteria were used for evaluation and comparison: prediction error, bias, accuracy, out-of-range forecasts, Akaike's Information Criteria (AIC), and log likelihood (LL). In this study, an external validation procedure was developed to quantitatively compare the forecasting power of the models for highway bridge component deterioration. The GLM method described in this study allows modeling ordinal and categorical dependent variable and shows slightly but significantly better model fitness and prediction performance than traditional regression model.
AB - Prediction of bridge component condition is fundamental for well-informed decisions regarding the maintenance, repair, and rehabilitation (MRR) of highway bridges. The National Bridge Inventory (NBI) condition rating is a major source of bridge condition data in the United States. In this study, a type of generalized linear model (GLM), the ordinal logistic statistical model, is presented and compared with the traditional regression model. The proposed model is evaluated in terms of reliability (the ability of a model to accurately predict bridge component ratings or the agreement between predictions and actual observations) and model fitness. Five criteria were used for evaluation and comparison: prediction error, bias, accuracy, out-of-range forecasts, Akaike's Information Criteria (AIC), and log likelihood (LL). In this study, an external validation procedure was developed to quantitatively compare the forecasting power of the models for highway bridge component deterioration. The GLM method described in this study allows modeling ordinal and categorical dependent variable and shows slightly but significantly better model fitness and prediction performance than traditional regression model.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065193721&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85065193721&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1155/2019/9797584
DO - 10.1155/2019/9797584
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85065193721
VL - 2019
JO - Mathematical Problems in Engineering
JF - Mathematical Problems in Engineering
SN - 1024-123X
M1 - 9797584
ER -