Prinz's problematic proxytypes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

Jesse Prinz has argued that a proxytype theory of concepts provides what he calls the 'intentionality' and 'cognitive content' desiderata better than any current competitor, and that the hybrid nature of proxytypes allows his theory to combine the informational component of informational atomism with the view that concepts are semantically structured entities. In response, I argue that the hybrid character of proxytypes, far from delivering the advantages Prinz claims, generates a threatening dilemma: either his theory is novel but fails to deliver the intentionality and cognitive content desiderata, or it delivers these desiderata but is not novel.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)594-606
Number of pages13
JournalPhilosophical Quarterly
Volume55
Issue number221
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2005

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Philosophy

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Prinz's problematic proxytypes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this