Procedural and distributive justice in sexual harassment arbitrations: Evolution of decisions in the union context

Steven E. Abraham, Paula B. Voos

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

We examine the evolution of labor arbitration decisions between 1988 and 2018 in which a union-represented employee was alleged to have committed sexual harassment. We find that management punished sexual harassment more stringently over time and that arbitrators became more sensitive to whether or not good procedure was followed by management over time. Distributive justice was also a major concern for arbitrators. The results suggest that it is essential for management to exercise procedural justice in disciplining employees, but that it is just as important for management to consider distributive justice when it comes to imposing discipline for inappropriate behavior.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationAdvances in Industrial and Labor Relations
PublisherEmerald Group Holdings Ltd.
Pages99-123
Number of pages25
DOIs
StatePublished - 2021

Publication series

NameAdvances in Industrial and Labor Relations
Volume26
ISSN (Print)0742-6186

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Industrial relations
  • Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)
  • Political Science and International Relations
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Keywords

  • Arbitration
  • Discharge
  • Discipline
  • Distributive justice
  • Procedural justice
  • Sexual harassment

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Procedural and distributive justice in sexual harassment arbitrations: Evolution of decisions in the union context'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this