TY - JOUR
T1 - Projecting climate change impacts from physics to fisheries
T2 - A view from three California Current fisheries
AU - Smith, James A.
AU - Pozo Buil, Mercedes
AU - Muhling, Barbara
AU - Tommasi, Desiree
AU - Brodie, Stephanie
AU - Frawley, Timothy H.
AU - Fiechter, Jerome
AU - Koenigstein, Stefan
AU - Himes-Cornell, Amber
AU - Alexander, Michael A.
AU - Bograd, Steven J.
AU - Cordero Quirós, Nathalí
AU - Crowder, Larry B.
AU - Curchitser, Enrique
AU - Green, Stephanie J.
AU - Hardy, Natasha A.
AU - Haynie, Alan C.
AU - Hazen, Elliott L.
AU - Holsman, Kirstin
AU - Le Fol, Gwendal
AU - Lezama-Ochoa, Nerea
AU - Rykaczewski, Ryan R.
AU - Stock, Charles A.
AU - Stohs, Stephen
AU - Sweeney, Jonathan
AU - Welch, Heather
AU - Jacox, Michael G.
N1 - Funding Information:
Funding was provided by NOAA’s Coastal and Ocean Climate Application COCA Program, United States ( NA17OAR4310268 ); NOAA’s Climate and Fisheries Adaptation CAFA Program, United States ( NA20OAR4310507 ); NOAA’s Integrated Ecosystem Assessment Program, United States , and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, United States (NASA; 80NSSC19K0187 ). For assistance with data access, we are grateful to the Pacific Fisheries Information Network (particularly J. Suter; https://pacfin.psmfc.org ), the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (particularly E. Hellmers), the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (particularly J. Ainsworth), the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (particularly C. Niles), and J. Rakitan at UCSC.
Funding Information:
Funding was provided by NOAA's Coastal and Ocean Climate Application COCA Program, United States (NA17OAR4310268); NOAA's Climate and Fisheries Adaptation CAFA Program, United States (NA20OAR4310507); NOAA's Integrated Ecosystem Assessment Program, United States, and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, United States (NASA; 80NSSC19K0187). For assistance with data access, we are grateful to the Pacific Fisheries Information Network (particularly J. Suter; https://pacfin.psmfc.org), the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (particularly E. Hellmers), the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (particularly J. Ainsworth), the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (particularly C. Niles), and J. Rakitan at UCSC. MGJ, MA, EC, RRR, AHC, SJB, JF, ELH, SS, DT, BM, AH and CAS initiated the Future Seas project, and MGJ led project administration. All authors contributed to project development and various aspects of the analyses. Ocean projections were led by MPB and MGJ, sardine analyses by JAS, BM, JF and SK, swordfish analyses by JAS, SB, SS, NLO and HW, and albacore analyses by BM, DT, TF and AMC. JAS and MGJ led the writing, and all authors contributed to the original draft and its revision.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Authors
PY - 2023/2
Y1 - 2023/2
N2 - Motivated by a need for climate-informed living marine resource management, increased emphasis has been placed on regional end-to-end modeling frameworks designed to project climate impacts on marine ecosystems and evaluate the efficacy of potential management strategies under changing conditions. The ‘Future Seas’ project was initiated with a focus on three fisheries (Pacific sardine, swordfish, and albacore tuna) in the California Current System (CCS). This work leverages a suite of climate, ocean, ecosystem, and economic models to project physical, ecological, and socio-economic change, evaluate management strategies, and quantify uncertainty in model projections. Here we describe the components of the modeling framework, considerations underlying choices made in model development, engagement with stakeholders, and key physical, ecological, and socio-economic results to date, including projections to 2100. Our broad aims are to (i) synthesize a large body of climate and fisheries research that has been conducted, and continues, under the Future Seas umbrella, and (ii) provide insight and recommendations to those pursuing similar efforts for other applications and in other regions. In general, our results indicate that all three species will likely shift their distributions (predominantly poleward) in the future, which impacts accessibility to fishing fleets, spatial management, and quota allocation. For similar integrative climate-to-fisheries projections, we recommend attention is given to: recognizing potential biases arising from differences between the climate products used for ecological model fitting and those used for model projection; how sources of projection uncertainty are prioritized, incorporated, and communicated; and quantitatively linking scenarios – especially socio-economic scenarios – with climate and ecological projections.
AB - Motivated by a need for climate-informed living marine resource management, increased emphasis has been placed on regional end-to-end modeling frameworks designed to project climate impacts on marine ecosystems and evaluate the efficacy of potential management strategies under changing conditions. The ‘Future Seas’ project was initiated with a focus on three fisheries (Pacific sardine, swordfish, and albacore tuna) in the California Current System (CCS). This work leverages a suite of climate, ocean, ecosystem, and economic models to project physical, ecological, and socio-economic change, evaluate management strategies, and quantify uncertainty in model projections. Here we describe the components of the modeling framework, considerations underlying choices made in model development, engagement with stakeholders, and key physical, ecological, and socio-economic results to date, including projections to 2100. Our broad aims are to (i) synthesize a large body of climate and fisheries research that has been conducted, and continues, under the Future Seas umbrella, and (ii) provide insight and recommendations to those pursuing similar efforts for other applications and in other regions. In general, our results indicate that all three species will likely shift their distributions (predominantly poleward) in the future, which impacts accessibility to fishing fleets, spatial management, and quota allocation. For similar integrative climate-to-fisheries projections, we recommend attention is given to: recognizing potential biases arising from differences between the climate products used for ecological model fitting and those used for model projection; how sources of projection uncertainty are prioritized, incorporated, and communicated; and quantitatively linking scenarios – especially socio-economic scenarios – with climate and ecological projections.
KW - Biological oceanography
KW - Climate prediction
KW - Fishery management
KW - Habitat selection
KW - ROMS
KW - Spatial planning
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85146971669&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85146971669&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.pocean.2023.102973
DO - 10.1016/j.pocean.2023.102973
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85146971669
SN - 0079-6611
VL - 211
JO - Progress in Oceanography
JF - Progress in Oceanography
M1 - 102973
ER -