TY - JOUR
T1 - Psychometric properties of the Male Urogenital Distress Inventory (MUDI) and Male Urinary Symptom Impact Questionnaire (MUSIQ) in patients following radical prostatectomy.
AU - Robinson, Joanne P.
AU - Avi-Itzhak, Tamara
AU - McCorkle, Ruth
PY - 2007/12
Y1 - 2007/12
N2 - INTRODUCTION: Research instruments can be used to assess the impact of lower urinary tract symptoms on health-related quality of life. Evaluating the reliability, validity, and sensitivity of two of these instruments provides evidence concerning their readiness for use in research and clinical settings. OBJECTIVE: The researchers evaluated psychometric properties of the Male Urogenital Distress Inventory and Male Urinary Symptom Impact Questionnaire in men suffering from lower urinary tract symptoms following radical prostatectomy. METHOD: The internal consistency reliability, concurrent validity, construct validity, and sensitivity of both instruments were evaluated in a cohort of men who participated in a larger study of nursing's impact on quality of life post-prostatectomy. RESULTS: The reliability, validity, and sensitivity of both instruments were supported in this population. CONCLUSIONS: Initial support is provided for use of the instruments to measure the effect of interventions for lower urinary tract symptoms and urine leakage on health-related quality of life during the first 6 months of recovery from radical prostatectomy; however, further research with a larger and more diverse sample is needed prior to using the instruments in clinical settings.
AB - INTRODUCTION: Research instruments can be used to assess the impact of lower urinary tract symptoms on health-related quality of life. Evaluating the reliability, validity, and sensitivity of two of these instruments provides evidence concerning their readiness for use in research and clinical settings. OBJECTIVE: The researchers evaluated psychometric properties of the Male Urogenital Distress Inventory and Male Urinary Symptom Impact Questionnaire in men suffering from lower urinary tract symptoms following radical prostatectomy. METHOD: The internal consistency reliability, concurrent validity, construct validity, and sensitivity of both instruments were evaluated in a cohort of men who participated in a larger study of nursing's impact on quality of life post-prostatectomy. RESULTS: The reliability, validity, and sensitivity of both instruments were supported in this population. CONCLUSIONS: Initial support is provided for use of the instruments to measure the effect of interventions for lower urinary tract symptoms and urine leakage on health-related quality of life during the first 6 months of recovery from radical prostatectomy; however, further research with a larger and more diverse sample is needed prior to using the instruments in clinical settings.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=39549118006&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=39549118006&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
C2 - 18217534
AN - SCOPUS:39549118006
SN - 1053-816X
VL - 27
SP - 512
EP - 518
JO - Urologic nursing : official journal of the American Urological Association Allied
JF - Urologic nursing : official journal of the American Urological Association Allied
IS - 6
ER -