Psychophysical evaluation of contrast sensitivity using Gabor patches in tobacco addiction

Thiago Monteiro Paiva Fernandes, Steven M. Silverstein, Natalia Leandro de Almeida, Natanael Antonio dos Santos

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

11 Scopus citations

Abstract

This study, an extension of Fernandes et al. (2017), provided consistent contrast sensitivity function (CSF) measurements in a large sample. CSF was assessed for luminance stimuli in different 48 chronic smokers and 50 healthy nonsmokers. Stimuli for the CSF were Gabor patches with spatial frequencies of.2, 2.5, 5.0, 10.0, and 20.0 cycles per degree (cpd). The use of Gabor patches minimizes uncertainty in spatial position and detection of frequencies. The Gabor patches consisted of vertical gratings that were multiplied by a two-dimensional spatial Gaussian envelope. All of the groups were matched for gender and level of education. All of the participants were free from any neurological disorder, cardiovascular disease, and identifiable ocular disease, and they had normal or corrected-to-normal visual acuity. No abnormalities were detected on the fundoscopic examination or optical coherence tomographic examination. The smoker group had a lower CSF compared with healthy nonsmokers at all spatial frequencies. These results indicate that cigarette smoking or chronic exposure to its constituent compounds affects early-stage visual discrimination, suggesting the existence of deficits in early visual spatial processing in smokers.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)68-73
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Clinical Neuroscience
Volume57
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2018

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery
  • Neurology
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Physiology (medical)

Keywords

  • Cigarette smoking
  • Psychophysics
  • Smoking
  • Visual perception

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Psychophysical evaluation of contrast sensitivity using Gabor patches in tobacco addiction'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this