Quantifying Health

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

If one supposes, as a first approximation, that the health department in some country has a fixed budget and that one of its central objectives is to enhance population health, then it needs to be able to compare the contributions made by different health-care interventions and their costs. If one assumes that the contributions of health-care interventions consist of the difference between the values of pretreatment and posttreatment of health conditions, then ranking of interventions requires ranking of health deficiencies. To rank health conditions in turn requires some way of making comparable the enormously heterogeneous health conditions in which people find themselves. This chapter asks how health economists assign values to health states and criticizes what it finds. It argues that health cannot literally be measured but that it can be valued in a variety of ways. It questions whether health conditions should be valued by the extent to which they satisfy population preferences, as determined by surveys of representative samples.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationThe Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Economics
PublisherTaylor and Francis
Pages433-442
Number of pages10
ISBN (Electronic)9781317578062
ISBN (Print)9781138824201
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2021

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • General Arts and Humanities

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Quantifying Health'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this