Racial disparities in minimally invasive esophagectomy and gastrectomy for upper GI malignancies

Syed F. Haider, Sirui Ma, Weiyi Xia, Kasey L. Wood, Mario M. Matabele, Patrick L. Quinn, Aziz Merchant, Ravi J. Chokshi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Esophageal cancer and gastric cancer are two important causes of upper GI malignancies. Literature has shown that minimally invasive esophagectomies (MIE) and gastrectomies (MIG), have shorter length of stay and fewer complications. However, limited literature exists about the association between race and access to MIE and MIG. This study aims to identify the racial disparities in the different approaches to esophagectomy and gastrectomy. We further evaluate the relationship between the race and postoperative complications. Methods: This IRB-approved retrospective study utilized data from the American College of Surgeons National Quality Improvement Program. All recorded cases of MIE, MIG, open gastrectomy, and esophagectomy between 2012 and 2019 were isolated. Propensity score matching and univariate analysis was performed to assess the independent effect of black self-identified race on access and outcomes. p < 0.05 was required to achieve statistical significance. Results: 7891 cases of esophagectomy and 5,132 cases of gastrectomy cases were identified. Using Propensity and logistic regression, we identified that black self-reported race is an independent predictor of open approach to gastrectomy (OR 1.6871943, 95% CI 1.431464–1.989829, p < 0.001). Black self-reported race was not predictive of operative approach among esophagectomy patients (OR 0.7942576, 95% CI 0.5698645–1.124228, p = 0.183). In contrast, black self-reported is an independent predictor of postoperative complications among esophagectomy patients only. Esophagectomy patients of black self-reported race were more likely to experience any complication (OR 1.4373437, 95% CI 1.1129239–1.8557096, p = 0.00537), severe complications (OR 1.3818966, 95% CI 1.0653087–1.7888454, p = 0.0144), and death (OR 2.00779762, 95% CI 1.08034921–3.56117535, p = 0.0211) within 30 days of their surgeries. Conclusion: Our analysis revealed a significant racial disparity in access to MIG and a higher incidence of post-operative complications amongst esophagectomy patients. Minimally invasive techniques are underutilized in racial minorities. The findings herein warrant further investigation to eliminate barriers and disparities. Graphical abstract: [Figure not available: see fulltext.].

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)9355-9363
Number of pages9
JournalSurgical Endoscopy
Volume36
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2022

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery

Keywords

  • Esophageal cancer
  • Esophagectomy
  • Gastrectomy
  • Gastric cancer
  • Health disparities
  • Racial disparities

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Racial disparities in minimally invasive esophagectomy and gastrectomy for upper GI malignancies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this