Randomized phase 2 study of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor dinaciclib (MK-7965) versus erlotinib in patients with non-small cell lung cancer

Joe J. Stephenson, John Nemunaitis, Anil A. Joy, Julie C. Martin, Ying Ming Jou, Da Zhang, Paul Statkevich, Siu Long Yao, Yali Zhu, Honghong Zhou, Karen Small, Rajat Bannerji, Martin J. Edelman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

43 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objectives: Dinaciclib (MK-7965, formerly SCH 727965), a novel, small-molecule inhibitor of cyclin-dependent kinases, has been shown to induce apoptosis in preclinical studies of human tumor cell lines, including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cells. Erlotinib, an epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor, is approved for the treatment of advanced NSCLC as second- or third-line therapy. This phase 2, randomized, multicenter, open-label study compared dinaciclib with erlotinib in patients with previously treated NSCLC. Materials and methods: The study was comprised of 2 parts: in part 1, patients were randomized to either intravenous (IV) dinaciclib (50mg/m2) or oral erlotinib (150mg) using an adaptive Bayesian design that adjusted the randomization ratio in favor of the more active arm, and in part 2, patients who had progressed on erlotinib were permitted to cross over to receive dinaciclib at the same dosage as in part 1. Patients were followed until disease progression or death, initiation of nonstudy cancer treatment, discontinuation, or withdrawal of consent. The primary efficacy end point was time-to-progression (TTP) in part 1 and objective response rate (ORR) in part 2. Results: Based on Kaplan-Meier estimates, the median TTP was 1.49 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.31, 2.63) following initial treatment with dinaciclib, compared with 1.58 months (95% CI: 1.38, 2.83) with erlotinib. No objective responses were observed following initial treatment with dinaciclib. Common severe (grade 3 or 4) drug-related adverse effects included neutropenia, leukopenia, vomiting, and diarrhea. Conclusions: Dinaciclib, administered IV, was well tolerated at the 50mg/m2 dose, but does not have activity as monotherapy in previously treated NSCLC. Evaluation of dinaciclib in combination with other agents for other indications including breast cancer and multiple myeloma is in progress.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)219-223
Number of pages5
JournalLung Cancer
Volume83
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2014

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Oncology
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Cancer Research

Keywords

  • CDK inhibitor
  • Dinaciclib
  • Erlotinib
  • Monotherapy
  • NSCLC
  • Phase 2

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Randomized phase 2 study of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor dinaciclib (MK-7965) versus erlotinib in patients with non-small cell lung cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Stephenson, J. J., Nemunaitis, J., Joy, A. A., Martin, J. C., Jou, Y. M., Zhang, D., Statkevich, P., Yao, S. L., Zhu, Y., Zhou, H., Small, K., Bannerji, R., & Edelman, M. J. (2014). Randomized phase 2 study of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor dinaciclib (MK-7965) versus erlotinib in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer, 83(2), 219-223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2013.11.020