Abstract
Despite the recognized value of semiotics in opening-out our perceptions of what constitutes the text of a performance, its literary associations have meant that most theatre semioticians concerned with reception cling to analogies between the literary reading act and the spectator's reception of a theatrical performance. For them, there is a conceptual as well as a metaphorical relationship between a literary text and what they term the performance text - and so, by implication, a similar relationship between how both are ‘read’. Taking these semioticians at their word, in the following article Ian Watson isolates the actor in the performance text, examines how s/he is read, and questions the attempts of scholars to ignore quality as an important component of this reading.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 135-146 |
Number of pages | 12 |
Journal | New Theatre Quarterly |
Volume | 11 |
Issue number | 42 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - May 1995 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts