TY - JOUR
T1 - Real life outcomes vs. clinical trial results
AU - Zarbin, Marco
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Journal of Ophthalmic and Vision Research | Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow.
PY - 2019/1/1
Y1 - 2019/1/1
N2 - Two questions that clinicians should answer as they attempt to apply the results of clinical trials to clinical practice are: (1) will statistically significant results be reproduced in their clinical practice; and (2) if nothing goes wrong in a clinical trial, is everything alright? Regarding the first question, when considering the results of a randomized, multicenter, prospective, controlled clinical trial, two questions that cannot be addressed by simply by reading the trial results and that only the practicing clinician can answer are: (1) is the study population representative of the patient about to be treated; and (2) is the totality of evidence outside the trial (including the clinician's own extensive experience) consistent with the trial result? Regarding the second question, clinicians are advised to recognize that most studies, even Phase 3 trials, are underpowered to accurately assess the risk of low frequency events.
AB - Two questions that clinicians should answer as they attempt to apply the results of clinical trials to clinical practice are: (1) will statistically significant results be reproduced in their clinical practice; and (2) if nothing goes wrong in a clinical trial, is everything alright? Regarding the first question, when considering the results of a randomized, multicenter, prospective, controlled clinical trial, two questions that cannot be addressed by simply by reading the trial results and that only the practicing clinician can answer are: (1) is the study population representative of the patient about to be treated; and (2) is the totality of evidence outside the trial (including the clinician's own extensive experience) consistent with the trial result? Regarding the second question, clinicians are advised to recognize that most studies, even Phase 3 trials, are underpowered to accurately assess the risk of low frequency events.
KW - Clinical Practice
KW - Clinical Trial
KW - Confidence Interval
KW - P value
KW - Rule of Three
KW - Statistical Significance
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85061305443&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85061305443&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.4103/jovr.jovr_279_18
DO - 10.4103/jovr.jovr_279_18
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85061305443
SN - 2008-2010
VL - 14
SP - 88
EP - 92
JO - Journal of Ophthalmic and Vision Research
JF - Journal of Ophthalmic and Vision Research
IS - 1
ER -