Abstract
Theories of Neoliberalism have acknowledged cross-national variations in Neoliberal trajectories but have been remiss in identifying subnational variations in the Neoliberal agenda. To explore this subnational variation, we examine the multifaceted Neoliberal attack on public sector unions in the 50 US states during the Tea Party era. We undertake a qualitative case study of four states as well as a quantitative historical study of all 50 states and find substantial regional variation between Southern and non-Southern states. In the non-South where public sector unionism is strong, we find that states that experience a transition from either Republican-To-Democratic or Democratic-To-Republican party control of state government experience declines in public sector union membership, but no such effect is found among Southern states where public sector unionism is already weak. Thus, despite variable events, circumstances and policy agendas in different states, Tea Party forces constrain state budgetary options and undermine public sector union membership.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 519-539 |
Number of pages | 21 |
Journal | Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society |
Volume | 11 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Oct 29 2018 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Geography, Planning and Development
- Sociology and Political Science
- Economics and Econometrics
Keywords
- Affirmative state
- Neoliberalism
- Public sector unions
- Tea Party
- US states