TY - JOUR
T1 - Reducing the Costs of an Eye Care Adherence Program for Underserved Children Referred Through Inner-City Vision Screenings
AU - Chung, Seung Ah
AU - Snitzer, Melanie
AU - Prioli, Katherine M.
AU - Pizzi, Laura T.
AU - Zhang, Qiang
AU - Levin, Alex V.
N1 - Funding Information:
Funding/Support: This project was supported in part by the Foerderer Fund (A.V.L.), the Robison D. Harley, MD, Endowed Chair in Pediatric Ophthalmology and Ocular Genetics, the Adeline Lutz - Steven S.T. Ching, M.D. Distinguished Professorship in Ophthalmology, and an unrestricted grant from Research to Prevent Blindness to the Department of Ophthalmology at the University of Rochester (A.V.L.). The Wills Eye Hospital is the recipient of a grant from the Deerbrook Foundation that supports the vision screening program. Give Kids Sight Day is an event supported by numerous partners. The Deerbrook Foundation had no role in study design; in the collection, analysis, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the article for publication. Financial Disclosures: There are no financial disclosures. All authors attest that they meet the current ICMJE criteria for authorship.
Funding Information:
CECAP is funded by a large private foundation, the City of Philadelphia, and other grants. Although such support is important to make CECAP financially viable, we have shown that the role of the social worker can be justified by additional revenue generated by the clinical care the social worker prompts.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2021/7
Y1 - 2021/7
N2 - Purpose: We previously reported costs and outcomes of the Children's Eye Care Adherence Program (CECAP1), a social worker intervention designed to improve adherence to eye care for underserved children in urban Philadelphia. Using cost findings from CECAP1, we revised the intervention to reduce costs. The aim of this study was to evaluate costs and effectiveness of the revised intervention (CECAP2). Design: Retrospective cohort study. Methods: Records of children needing ophthalmic follow-up after 2 community-based vision screening programs were reviewed. We modified CECAP1 to prioritize children more likely to visit, decreased phone calls and scheduling attempts, better documented children already followed by other doctors, and constricted our geographic catchment area for better accessibility. Cost was calculated using time spent executing CECAP2 by our salaried social worker. Effectiveness was defined as the percentage of patients completing at least 1 follow-up visit within the recommended time frame. Results: Of 462 children referred to CECAP2 from our in-school and on-campus screening programs, 242 (52.4%) completed subsequent recommended eye examinations, a proportion identical to our prior report (52.3%). Social worker time per patient was 0.8 hours; a significant reduction from the previous 2.6 hours (P < .01). Cost per patient was $32.73; a significant reduction compared to the previous $77.20 (P < .01). Conclusions: Programmatic changes to reduce social worker intervention time and target potential patients by likelihood to attend along with constriction of the catchment area led to reduced costs by more than 50%, without impairing CECAP effectiveness.
AB - Purpose: We previously reported costs and outcomes of the Children's Eye Care Adherence Program (CECAP1), a social worker intervention designed to improve adherence to eye care for underserved children in urban Philadelphia. Using cost findings from CECAP1, we revised the intervention to reduce costs. The aim of this study was to evaluate costs and effectiveness of the revised intervention (CECAP2). Design: Retrospective cohort study. Methods: Records of children needing ophthalmic follow-up after 2 community-based vision screening programs were reviewed. We modified CECAP1 to prioritize children more likely to visit, decreased phone calls and scheduling attempts, better documented children already followed by other doctors, and constricted our geographic catchment area for better accessibility. Cost was calculated using time spent executing CECAP2 by our salaried social worker. Effectiveness was defined as the percentage of patients completing at least 1 follow-up visit within the recommended time frame. Results: Of 462 children referred to CECAP2 from our in-school and on-campus screening programs, 242 (52.4%) completed subsequent recommended eye examinations, a proportion identical to our prior report (52.3%). Social worker time per patient was 0.8 hours; a significant reduction from the previous 2.6 hours (P < .01). Cost per patient was $32.73; a significant reduction compared to the previous $77.20 (P < .01). Conclusions: Programmatic changes to reduce social worker intervention time and target potential patients by likelihood to attend along with constriction of the catchment area led to reduced costs by more than 50%, without impairing CECAP effectiveness.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85104106180&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85104106180&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ajo.2021.02.012
DO - 10.1016/j.ajo.2021.02.012
M3 - Article
C2 - 33582091
AN - SCOPUS:85104106180
SN - 0002-9394
VL - 227
SP - 18
EP - 24
JO - American journal of ophthalmology
JF - American journal of ophthalmology
ER -