Abstract
According to Selim Berker the prevalence of consequentialism in contemporary epistemology rivals its prevalence in contemporary ethics. Similarly, and more to the point, Berker finds epistemic consequentialism, epitomized by process reliabilism, to be as misguided and problematic as ethical consequentialism. This paper shows how Berker misconstrues process reliabilism and fails to pinpoint any new or substantial defects in it.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 131-143 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Journal | Episteme |
| Volume | 12 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jun 16 2015 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- History and Philosophy of Science
Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Reliabilism, veritism, and epistemic consequentialism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
Cite this
Goldman, A. (2015). Reliabilism, veritism, and epistemic consequentialism. Episteme, 12(2), 131-143. https://doi.org/10.1017/epi.2015.25