Remote and edgy: New takes on old anthropological themes

Erik Harms, Shafqat Hussain, Sasha Newell, Charles Piot, Louisa Schein, Sara Shneiderman, Terence S. Turner, Juan Zhang

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

24 Scopus citations

Abstract

Eight anthropologists working in various parts of Asia, Africa, and Latin America reflect on an essay by Edwin Ardener on the concept of remote areas recently reprinted in Hau (Volume 2, Issue 1). These reflections all show that the idea of the remote can be detached from its geographical moorings and understood not simply as a spatial concept but as a relativistic social construct. Considered in conjunction with the notion of edginess, they understand remoteness not so much as a place, but as a way of being. By purposefully comparing work in cities and in places more commonly described as remote, they show that the remote may be present in any site of anthropological inquiry.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)361-381
Number of pages21
JournalHAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory
Volume4
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2014

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Anthropology

Keywords

  • Borders
  • Edginess
  • Edwin Ardener
  • Margins
  • Place
  • Remote areas

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Remote and edgy: New takes on old anthropological themes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Harms, E., Hussain, S., Newell, S., Piot, C., Schein, L., Shneiderman, S., Turner, T. S., & Zhang, J. (2014). Remote and edgy: New takes on old anthropological themes. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 4(1), 361-381. https://doi.org/10.14318/hau4.1.020