Abstract
Reformers in psychology who have mobilized to respond to the “replication crisis” in psychology are subject to social psychological and group influences characteristic of social movements. While producing significant, badly-needed changes in the conduct of science, the rhetoric and argument that best motivate concerted action may neglect nuance, proportion, and apt attention to countervailing considerations and context. To minimize unintended consequences, the movement will benefit if it can entertain criticisms without identifying critics as enemies of science. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved)
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 131-133 |
Number of pages | 3 |
Journal | Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology |
Volume | 41 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 2021 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Philosophy
- Psychology(all)
Keywords
- frame
- replication
- research
- social movement
- theory