TY - JOUR
T1 - Resident status influences perceptions about beach resource valuation and restoration
AU - Burger, Joanna
AU - Tsipoura, Nellie
N1 - Funding Information:
We particularly thank the respondents who gave willingly of their time to be interviewed, and the many town officials and Wetlands Institute personnel who gave permission to interview people, aided logistically, and provided advice during this study. We especially thank D. Mizrahi, L. Niles, C. Davis, and Lisa Ferguson for their help and support, as well as April Simnor, T. Pittfield and C. Jeitner for help with the interviews, statistical analysis, and graphics. This research was funded by the Hurricane Sandy Coastal Resiliency Competitive Grants Program administered by the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation (# 41991). Partial funding was from Rutgers University, New Jersey Audubon, Wetlands Institute, NIEHS Center of Excellence (CEED, P30ES005022), and USDA NIFA Hatch Multistate project 1008906 through NJAES (Hatch NJ12233). This paper represents the views of the authors, and not the funding agency.
Funding Information:
We particularly thank the respondents who gave willingly of their time to be interviewed, and the many town officials and Wetlands Institute personnel who gave permission to interview people, aided logistically, and provided advice during this study. We especially thank D. Mizrahi, L. Niles, C. Davis, and Lisa Ferguson for their help and support, as well as April Simnor, T. Pittfield and C. Jeitner for help with the interviews, statistical analysis, and graphics. This research was funded by the Hurricane Sandy Coastal Resiliency Competitive Grants Program administered by the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation (# 41991). Partial funding was from Rutgers University, New Jersey Audubon, Wetlands Institute, NIEHS Center of Excellence (CEED, P30ES005022), and USDA NIFA Hatch Multistate project 1008906 through NJAES (Hatch NJ12233). This paper represents the views of the authors, and not the funding agency.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
PY - 2019/8/15
Y1 - 2019/8/15
N2 - Sandy beaches represent typical destinations for recreation and tourism worldwide, as well as being a lifestyle for people living along the shore. In the Northeastern United States coastal environments are build-up and overexploited, threatening both ecosystem integrity and coastal communities. Following hurricane Sandy, the US government funded a number of restoration projects aimed at increasing resiliency of coastal ecosystems and human communities. In light of this, research about human perceptions and concerns during a restoration project was conducted to assist in planning and decision making for continued beach restoration and management, including monitoring avian resources. Objectives were to determine if there were differences among permanent coastal residents, part-time residents (summer), and non-residents (tourists) concerning visitation to the beach, knowledge about the restoration project, birds using the beach, and ratings of ecological resources and beach management options. There were no differences in knowledge of the bird species that were endangered nor in the conservation projects aimed at protecting birds as a function of resident status. People were aware of the roped-off nesting areas, but less aware of the conservation areas or even stewards on the beach. However, permanent residents were significantly more aware of the protective signage and that dogs were not allowed on the beach than others. Less than half of the people knew about the recent restoration project, and part-time residents were more aware of building up the dunes and creating nesting habitat, and less aware of dredging, beach replenishment and habitat restoration than other types of residents. When asked to rate different protection values, there were no differences for protecting the environment, but non-residents rated protecting birds, protecting endangered species, and providing conservation information to the public higher than others, and part-time residents rated predator control higher than others. This information can be used to target different segments of the beach-using community, particularly to residents on the importance of their local beach to protection of the environment, endangered species, and birds.
AB - Sandy beaches represent typical destinations for recreation and tourism worldwide, as well as being a lifestyle for people living along the shore. In the Northeastern United States coastal environments are build-up and overexploited, threatening both ecosystem integrity and coastal communities. Following hurricane Sandy, the US government funded a number of restoration projects aimed at increasing resiliency of coastal ecosystems and human communities. In light of this, research about human perceptions and concerns during a restoration project was conducted to assist in planning and decision making for continued beach restoration and management, including monitoring avian resources. Objectives were to determine if there were differences among permanent coastal residents, part-time residents (summer), and non-residents (tourists) concerning visitation to the beach, knowledge about the restoration project, birds using the beach, and ratings of ecological resources and beach management options. There were no differences in knowledge of the bird species that were endangered nor in the conservation projects aimed at protecting birds as a function of resident status. People were aware of the roped-off nesting areas, but less aware of the conservation areas or even stewards on the beach. However, permanent residents were significantly more aware of the protective signage and that dogs were not allowed on the beach than others. Less than half of the people knew about the recent restoration project, and part-time residents were more aware of building up the dunes and creating nesting habitat, and less aware of dredging, beach replenishment and habitat restoration than other types of residents. When asked to rate different protection values, there were no differences for protecting the environment, but non-residents rated protecting birds, protecting endangered species, and providing conservation information to the public higher than others, and part-time residents rated predator control higher than others. This information can be used to target different segments of the beach-using community, particularly to residents on the importance of their local beach to protection of the environment, endangered species, and birds.
KW - Beach
KW - Birds
KW - Conservation
KW - Perceptions
KW - Resident vs non-resident
KW - Restoration
KW - Value ratings
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85069447683&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85069447683&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11252-019-00860-y
DO - 10.1007/s11252-019-00860-y
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85069447683
SN - 1083-8155
VL - 22
SP - 785
EP - 793
JO - Urban Ecosystems
JF - Urban Ecosystems
IS - 4
ER -