Response 2: Technology-supported communication in science: Conjectures on expertise and evaluation

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Practices associated with communication in science can be supported by technology applications, as nicely articulated in the work being done by Jean Moon and Stacey Pigg, William Hart-Davidson, Jeff Grabill, and Kirsten Ellenbogen. These are examples of using technology to do better things rather than using technology to do conventional things better (Roschelle, Pea, Hoadley, Gordin, & Means, 2000). Although the purposes and intended audiences of each effort are quite different, each is focused on helping users both develop and model epistemic reasoning around science content.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationReconceptualizing STEM Education
Subtitle of host publicationThe Central Role of Practices
PublisherTaylor and Francis
Pages289-299
Number of pages11
ISBN (Electronic)9781317458517
ISBN (Print)9781138901032
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2016

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • General Social Sciences

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Response 2: Technology-supported communication in science: Conjectures on expertise and evaluation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this