Responses to My Critics

Daniel M. Hausman

doi:10.1093/phe/phx007

Responses to My Critics

Daniel M. Hausman

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

This essay responds to the helpful criticisms of Valuing Health: Well-Being, Freedom, and Suffering, which have been offered by Elselijn Kingma, Adam Oliver, Anna Alexandrova, Alex Voorhoeve, Erik Nord and James Wilson. I am extremely grateful to Jonathan Wolf and especially James Wilson for arranging a one-day conference on my book, Valuing Health: Well-Being, Freedom, and Suffering [Hausman, D. (2015). Valuing Health: Well-Being, Freedom, and Suffering. Oxford: Oxford University Press.], and for publishing this symposium. I am also grateful to the wonderful six scholars who took the time to study my work and to offer perceptive and helpful criticisms. Without unduly trying the patience of readers, I cannot respond to all their remarks, but I hope that in what follows I have replied to the most important of their comments on the arguments and conclusions of Valuing Health. Before I begin these replies, a brief synopsis of Valuing Health may be helpful to the reader.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	164-175
Number of pages	12
Journal	Public Health Ethics
Volume	10
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1093/phe/phx007
State	Published - Jul 1 2017
Externally published	Yes

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Issues, ethics and legal aspects
Health Policy

Access to Document

10.1093/phe/phx007

Cite this

@article{8deabc64e5d84a06a6aeec9799511bf7,

title = "Responses to My Critics",

abstract = "This essay responds to the helpful criticisms of Valuing Health: Well-Being, Freedom, and Suffering, which have been offered by Elselijn Kingma, Adam Oliver, Anna Alexandrova, Alex Voorhoeve, Erik Nord and James Wilson. I am extremely grateful to Jonathan Wolf and especially James Wilson for arranging a one-day conference on my book, Valuing Health: Well-Being, Freedom, and Suffering [Hausman, D. (2015). Valuing Health: Well-Being, Freedom, and Suffering. Oxford: Oxford University Press.], and for publishing this symposium. I am also grateful to the wonderful six scholars who took the time to study my work and to offer perceptive and helpful criticisms. Without unduly trying the patience of readers, I cannot respond to all their remarks, but I hope that in what follows I have replied to the most important of their comments on the arguments and conclusions of Valuing Health. Before I begin these replies, a brief synopsis of Valuing Health may be helpful to the reader.",

author = "Hausman, {Daniel M.}",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} The Author 2016.",

year = "2017",

month = jul,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1093/phe/phx007",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "10",

pages = "164--175",

journal = "Public Health Ethics",

issn = "1754-9973",

publisher = "Oxford University Press",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Responses to My Critics

AU - Hausman, Daniel M.

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © The Author 2016.

PY - 2017/7/1

Y1 - 2017/7/1

N2 - This essay responds to the helpful criticisms of Valuing Health: Well-Being, Freedom, and Suffering, which have been offered by Elselijn Kingma, Adam Oliver, Anna Alexandrova, Alex Voorhoeve, Erik Nord and James Wilson. I am extremely grateful to Jonathan Wolf and especially James Wilson for arranging a one-day conference on my book, Valuing Health: Well-Being, Freedom, and Suffering [Hausman, D. (2015). Valuing Health: Well-Being, Freedom, and Suffering. Oxford: Oxford University Press.], and for publishing this symposium. I am also grateful to the wonderful six scholars who took the time to study my work and to offer perceptive and helpful criticisms. Without unduly trying the patience of readers, I cannot respond to all their remarks, but I hope that in what follows I have replied to the most important of their comments on the arguments and conclusions of Valuing Health. Before I begin these replies, a brief synopsis of Valuing Health may be helpful to the reader.

AB - This essay responds to the helpful criticisms of Valuing Health: Well-Being, Freedom, and Suffering, which have been offered by Elselijn Kingma, Adam Oliver, Anna Alexandrova, Alex Voorhoeve, Erik Nord and James Wilson. I am extremely grateful to Jonathan Wolf and especially James Wilson for arranging a one-day conference on my book, Valuing Health: Well-Being, Freedom, and Suffering [Hausman, D. (2015). Valuing Health: Well-Being, Freedom, and Suffering. Oxford: Oxford University Press.], and for publishing this symposium. I am also grateful to the wonderful six scholars who took the time to study my work and to offer perceptive and helpful criticisms. Without unduly trying the patience of readers, I cannot respond to all their remarks, but I hope that in what follows I have replied to the most important of their comments on the arguments and conclusions of Valuing Health. Before I begin these replies, a brief synopsis of Valuing Health may be helpful to the reader.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85024110042&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85024110042&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/phe/phx007

DO - 10.1093/phe/phx007

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:85024110042

SN - 1754-9973

VL - 10

SP - 164

EP - 175

JO - Public Health Ethics

JF - Public Health Ethics

IS - 2

ER -

Responses to My Critics

Abstract

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this