TY - JOUR
T1 - Role of uncertainties in protecting ecological resources during remediation and restoration
AU - Burger, Joanna
AU - Gochfeld, Michael
AU - Bunn, Amoret
AU - Looney, Brian
AU - Jeitner, Christian
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was supported by the Department of Energy (DE-FC01-06EW07053, DE-FG-26-00NT 40938) through the Consortium for Risk Evaluation with Stakeholder Participation (CRESP), at Vanderbilt University, Rutgers the State University of New Jersey, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture (NJ Agriculture and Extension Service, Project 826728, W4045). We thank many colleagues who have discussed ecological resources, ecological risk and evaluations, and the values Tribes and stakeholders hold for the Hanford Site, as well as several colleagues at the Savannah River Site who worked with us over the years. We especially thank David Kosson and Charles Powers. James Clarke provided useful insights during the review process. The opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the U.S. DOE, Rutgers University, Vanderbilt University, and other participating universities.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Taylor & Francis.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Cleanup of contaminated waste sites is a National priority to protect human health and the environment, while restoring land to productive uses. While there are uncertainties with understanding risk to individuals from exposure, the aim of this study was to focus on uncertainties and complexities for ecological systems, complicated by hundreds of species occupying any remediation site which participate in multiple-interacting food webs. The ability to better predict the effectiveness of remediation in fostering future ecosystems might facilitate remedy selection and improve strategic environmental management. This investigation examined (1) uncertainties in ecosystem processes, (2) uncertainties in exposure from contamination before remediation, and (3) uncertainties during remediation. Two Department of Energy sites Hanford Site and Savannah River Site were used as case studies to illustrate how the uncertainties affect eco-receptors. Several types of ecological, physical, and human dimension uncertainties are defined. Ecological uncertainties include temporal, spatial, individual, developmental, and exogenous types. Physical uncertainties are weather-related, watershed variations, slope/aspect, soil/sediment structure and form, unforeseen events, and temporal patterns. Human dimension uncertainties include current land use, future land use, extractive and non-extractive recreation. The effects of remedial strategies varied between the two sites because Hanford is a primarily arid shrub-steppe ecotype, while Savannah River is a wet forest ecotype. Defining the associated ecological sensitivities and uncertainties and providing examples might help policy-makers, managers, planners, and contractors to be aware of issues to consider throughout planning, remediation, and restoration. Adding ecological uncertainty analysis to risk evaluations and remediation planning is analogous to using safety factors in human health risk assessment.
AB - Cleanup of contaminated waste sites is a National priority to protect human health and the environment, while restoring land to productive uses. While there are uncertainties with understanding risk to individuals from exposure, the aim of this study was to focus on uncertainties and complexities for ecological systems, complicated by hundreds of species occupying any remediation site which participate in multiple-interacting food webs. The ability to better predict the effectiveness of remediation in fostering future ecosystems might facilitate remedy selection and improve strategic environmental management. This investigation examined (1) uncertainties in ecosystem processes, (2) uncertainties in exposure from contamination before remediation, and (3) uncertainties during remediation. Two Department of Energy sites Hanford Site and Savannah River Site were used as case studies to illustrate how the uncertainties affect eco-receptors. Several types of ecological, physical, and human dimension uncertainties are defined. Ecological uncertainties include temporal, spatial, individual, developmental, and exogenous types. Physical uncertainties are weather-related, watershed variations, slope/aspect, soil/sediment structure and form, unforeseen events, and temporal patterns. Human dimension uncertainties include current land use, future land use, extractive and non-extractive recreation. The effects of remedial strategies varied between the two sites because Hanford is a primarily arid shrub-steppe ecotype, while Savannah River is a wet forest ecotype. Defining the associated ecological sensitivities and uncertainties and providing examples might help policy-makers, managers, planners, and contractors to be aware of issues to consider throughout planning, remediation, and restoration. Adding ecological uncertainty analysis to risk evaluations and remediation planning is analogous to using safety factors in human health risk assessment.
KW - Department of Energy
KW - Hanford site
KW - Savannah River site
KW - Uncertainties
KW - ecological effects
KW - ecosystems
KW - remediation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85101747151&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85101747151&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/15287394.2021.1887783
DO - 10.1080/15287394.2021.1887783
M3 - Article
C2 - 33632081
AN - SCOPUS:85101747151
SN - 1528-7394
VL - 84
SP - 485
EP - 502
JO - Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health - Part A: Current Issues
JF - Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health - Part A: Current Issues
IS - 12
ER -