Romantic Diversitarianism: Problems and Promises

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This paper responds to a question posed by the organizers of the 2019 meeting of the North American Society for the Study of Romanticism: how might A. O. Lovejoy’s 1941 essay “The Meaning of Romanticism for the Historian of Ideas” have something new to say now, especially in relation to our current institutional circumstances as Romanticists? I focus on Lovejoy’s treatment of Romantic Eigentümlichkeit, or “diversitarianism,” as a contributing factor in the rise of twentieth-century fascist movements. Pairing Lovejoy’s essay with Rey Chow’s “The Fascist Longings in Our Midst,” I suggest that Romantic-era diversitarianism already exhibited forms of desire that characterize fascism. By way of conclusion, I warn that a fascism at the heart of liberal multiculturalism threatens uncritical efforts to diversify Romanticism.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)295-300
Number of pages6
JournalEuropean Romantic Review
Volume31
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 3 2020

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Cultural Studies
  • Literature and Literary Theory

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Romantic Diversitarianism: Problems and Promises'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this