Rorschach Oral Imagery, Attachment Style, and Interpersonal Relatedness

Paul R. Duberstein, Nancy L. Talbot

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Data on a college sample (n = 198) were used to examine the hypothesized relationship between Rorschach orality and self-reported attachment style. The number of Rorschach Human responses was also examined. High orals were more often classified as insecure than low orals. Within the low-oral group, however, subjects who produced no oral responses were more likely to be classified as insecure than subjects who produced one oral response, 78% versus 35%; p <.005. This implies that there is heterogeneity within the low-oral group. Neither orality nor attachment security was meaningfully related to the number of Human responses provided, but the Human responses provided by insecure (vs. secure) subjects more frequently evidenced themes of struggle. We concluded that (a) there is a subgroup of low orals who are not interpersonally secure but who, instead, are insecure and interpersonally anxious; and (b) unlike the quality of the Human response, the number of Human responses may not reflect preoccupations with themes of dependency, attachment, and interpersonal relatedness.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)294-310
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of Personality Assessment
Volume61
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1993
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Imagery (Psychotherapy)

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis

Cite this

@article{6e79849d7fff4f0dbf4dcde82f98caca,
title = "Rorschach Oral Imagery, Attachment Style, and Interpersonal Relatedness",
abstract = "Data on a college sample (n = 198) were used to examine the hypothesized relationship between Rorschach orality and self-reported attachment style. The number of Rorschach Human responses was also examined. High orals were more often classified as insecure than low orals. Within the low-oral group, however, subjects who produced no oral responses were more likely to be classified as insecure than subjects who produced one oral response, 78{\%} versus 35{\%}; p <.005. This implies that there is heterogeneity within the low-oral group. Neither orality nor attachment security was meaningfully related to the number of Human responses provided, but the Human responses provided by insecure (vs. secure) subjects more frequently evidenced themes of struggle. We concluded that (a) there is a subgroup of low orals who are not interpersonally secure but who, instead, are insecure and interpersonally anxious; and (b) unlike the quality of the Human response, the number of Human responses may not reflect preoccupations with themes of dependency, attachment, and interpersonal relatedness.",
author = "Duberstein, {Paul R.} and Talbot, {Nancy L.}",
year = "1993",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1207/s15327752jpa6102_10",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "61",
pages = "294--310",
journal = "Journal of Personality Assessment",
issn = "0022-3891",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "2",

}

Rorschach Oral Imagery, Attachment Style, and Interpersonal Relatedness. / Duberstein, Paul R.; Talbot, Nancy L.

In: Journal of Personality Assessment, Vol. 61, No. 2, 01.01.1993, p. 294-310.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Rorschach Oral Imagery, Attachment Style, and Interpersonal Relatedness

AU - Duberstein, Paul R.

AU - Talbot, Nancy L.

PY - 1993/1/1

Y1 - 1993/1/1

N2 - Data on a college sample (n = 198) were used to examine the hypothesized relationship between Rorschach orality and self-reported attachment style. The number of Rorschach Human responses was also examined. High orals were more often classified as insecure than low orals. Within the low-oral group, however, subjects who produced no oral responses were more likely to be classified as insecure than subjects who produced one oral response, 78% versus 35%; p <.005. This implies that there is heterogeneity within the low-oral group. Neither orality nor attachment security was meaningfully related to the number of Human responses provided, but the Human responses provided by insecure (vs. secure) subjects more frequently evidenced themes of struggle. We concluded that (a) there is a subgroup of low orals who are not interpersonally secure but who, instead, are insecure and interpersonally anxious; and (b) unlike the quality of the Human response, the number of Human responses may not reflect preoccupations with themes of dependency, attachment, and interpersonal relatedness.

AB - Data on a college sample (n = 198) were used to examine the hypothesized relationship between Rorschach orality and self-reported attachment style. The number of Rorschach Human responses was also examined. High orals were more often classified as insecure than low orals. Within the low-oral group, however, subjects who produced no oral responses were more likely to be classified as insecure than subjects who produced one oral response, 78% versus 35%; p <.005. This implies that there is heterogeneity within the low-oral group. Neither orality nor attachment security was meaningfully related to the number of Human responses provided, but the Human responses provided by insecure (vs. secure) subjects more frequently evidenced themes of struggle. We concluded that (a) there is a subgroup of low orals who are not interpersonally secure but who, instead, are insecure and interpersonally anxious; and (b) unlike the quality of the Human response, the number of Human responses may not reflect preoccupations with themes of dependency, attachment, and interpersonal relatedness.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84963133530&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84963133530&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1207/s15327752jpa6102_10

DO - 10.1207/s15327752jpa6102_10

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84963133530

VL - 61

SP - 294

EP - 310

JO - Journal of Personality Assessment

JF - Journal of Personality Assessment

SN - 0022-3891

IS - 2

ER -